On 16 Jul 2010 at 12:33, Jim Bosch wrote:
> But I don't know much more than this, and I'm also curious to hear the
> story told by someone who has more information...why hasn't
> multithreading support been added? Does it just add too much overhead
> for those who don't need it?
Atomic exchan
On 16 Jul 2010 at 13:38, Charles Solar wrote:
> I mentioned it before but I have this patch for boost python that adds
> code to lock and unlock the gil at all the boundaries I have found
> between python and boost python. This makes it so multiple threads
> can call into python without the user
On 07/16/2010 11:38 AM, Charles Solar wrote:
I mentioned it before but I have this patch for boost python that adds
code to lock and unlock the gil at all the boundaries I have found
between python and boost python. This makes it so multiple threads
can call into python without the user having t
I mentioned it before but I have this patch for boost python that adds
code to lock and unlock the gil at all the boundaries I have found
between python and boost python. This makes it so multiple threads
can call into python without the user having to lock and unlock the
gil themselves. I am pre
