On 2011-4-18 03:50, Charles Solar wrote:
Well I know python uses ref counting, so I was hoping the support for
chain methods would be near identical to C++'s since python would not
have any reference to hold onto for Test().
That is true for CPython, but may not be true for other python
implem
Ahh very cool, exactly what I was looking for.
I did not know about __builtin__._ Figured it was something funny like
that, glad its just a shell thing.
Thank you
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 9:07 PM, INADA Naoki wrote:
> Python Interactive shell stores result of an expression to a variable
> named
Python Interactive shell stores result of an expression to a variable
named '__builtin__._'.
So, ``del _`` may help you.
This behavior is only on interactive shell. When running script, '_'
is not used and Python
may acts you expect.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Charles Solar wrote:
> I hav
Well I know python uses ref counting, so I was hoping the support for chain
methods would be near identical to C++'s since python would not have any
reference to hold onto for Test(). It works great when inside a function,
but not so well in the global namespace. :(
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 8:06 P
On 2011-04-17 20:56, Charles Solar wrote:
Is there something I should be aware of here?
Just that Python uses garbage collection and you mustn't rely on your
objects being destroyed at a particular point in the program flow. :-)
Some sort of difference between the global instances and one
I have a python module written in C++, and the C++ code has a few instances
that involve method chaining. I was experimenting with python support for
these methods and I found something odd.
However it seems this is more a python eccentricity than Boost Python,
consider the following code sample.
