Re: [C++-sig] Enums with duplicated values.

2009-02-10 Thread Hugo Lima
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:34 PM, David Abrahams wrote: > > on Tue Feb 10 2009, Hugo Lima wrote: > >> David, any comments about the patch? > > Please attach the patch to a Trac ticket and I'll have a look. Ok, https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/2744 > -- > Dave Abrahams > BoostPro Computing

Re: [C++-sig] Enums with duplicated values.

2009-02-10 Thread David Abrahams
on Tue Feb 10 2009, Hugo Lima wrote: > David, any comments about the patch? Please attach the patch to a Trac ticket and I'll have a look. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com ___ Cplusplus-sig mailing list Cplusplus-sig@pytho

Re: [C++-sig] Enums with duplicated values.

2009-02-10 Thread Hugo Lima
David, any comments about the patch? On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Hugo Lima wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:13 AM, David Abrahams wrote: >> >> on Wed Dec 17 2008, "Hugo Lima" wrote: >> >>> Hi; >>> >>> I need wrap enums with duplicated values, but boost::python do not >>> support it. At t

Re: [C++-sig] Enums with duplicated values.

2009-02-03 Thread Hugo Lima
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:13 AM, David Abrahams wrote: > > on Wed Dec 17 2008, "Hugo Lima" wrote: > >> Hi; >> >> I need wrap enums with duplicated values, but boost::python do not >> support it. At the boost website you can find the quote: >> >> "Scott Snyder provided a patch; Dave was dissatisf

Re: [C++-sig] Enums with duplicated values.

2008-12-18 Thread David Abrahams
on Wed Dec 17 2008, "Hugo Lima" wrote: > Hi; > > I need wrap enums with duplicated values, but boost::python do not > support it. At the boost website you can find the quote: > > "Scott Snyder provided a patch; Dave was dissatisfied for some reason, I think I didn't really like the asymmetry of

[C++-sig] Enums with duplicated values.

2008-12-17 Thread Hugo Lima
Hi; I need wrap enums with duplicated values, but boost::python do not support it. At the boost website you can find the quote: "Scott Snyder provided a patch; Dave was dissatisfied for some reason, but maybe it should just be applied if no further action occurs http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/M