Re: [C++-sig] Boost Pro Python Version

2009-01-28 Thread David Abrahams
on Wed Jan 28 2009, Cameron Royal wrote: > David Abrahams-3 wrote: >> >> Have you tried the build and test with Boost.Build/bjam as instructed in >> the tutorial? >> > > I had hoped the precompiled binaries would be fine, but it seems not. After > building the latest version of boost myself wi

Re: [C++-sig] Boost Pro Python Version

2009-01-28 Thread Cameron Royal
David Abrahams-3 wrote: > > Have you tried the build and test with Boost.Build/bjam as instructed in > the tutorial? > I had hoped the precompiled binaries would be fine, but it seems not. After building the latest version of boost myself with python 2.5 it seems to be working now. Thanks for

Re: [C++-sig] Boost Pro Python Version

2009-01-28 Thread Marcus Lindblom
Cameron Royal wrote: So I'm having some difficulty getting one of the boost.python tutorial examples working. In particular the class with a string constuctor. http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_37_0/libs/python/doc/tutorial/doc/html/python/exposing.html#python.constructors This exact example cras

Re: [C++-sig] Boost Pro Python Version

2009-01-27 Thread David Abrahams
on Tue Jan 27 2009, Cameron Royal wrote: > So I'm having some difficulty getting one of the boost.python tutorial > examples working. In particular the class with a string constuctor. > > http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_37_0/libs/python/doc/tutorial/doc/html/python/exposing.html#python.construct