whole thing and see if
I can figure out what's going on.
Jim
> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 13:00:11 -0700
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [C++-sig] Boost Python loss of values
>
> On 08/26/2011 08:27 AM, Jay Riley wrote:
>
Self is indeed a PyObject*
this is a bit confusing
> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 13:00:11 -0700
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [C++-sig] Boost Python loss of values
>
> On 08/26/2011 08:27 AM, Jay Riley wrote:
> > Hi Jim,
> >
Thu, 25 Aug 2011 13:18:04 -0700
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> CC: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [C++-sig] Boost Python loss of values
>
> On 08/25/2011 04:17 AM, Jay Riley wrote:
>
> >
> > And the python exposing is do
member of the base class anyways?
> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 13:18:04 -0700
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> CC: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [C++-sig] Boost Python loss of values
>
> On 08/25/2011 04:17 AM, Jay Riley wrote:
>
> >
On 08/25/2011 04:17 AM, Jay Riley wrote:
And the python exposing is done as follows:
class_, bases
>("Attack")
.def("CalculateDamage", &AttackWrapper::CalculateDamageDefault);
This bit looks a little suspect, and I'm surprised that it compiles -
class_ should only take 4 arguments if one
