[C++-sig] pygccxml and inner classes

I'm wondering if this behavior is correct when using pygccxml. Consider the following two sets of simple class definitions: -- SET 1 -- class inner { protected: unsigned a; unsigned b; unsigned c; }; class Cool { public: Cool(){} protected: i

Re: [C++-sig] pygccxml and inner classes

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Davidson, Josh wrote: > I'm wondering if this behavior is correct when using pygccxml. Consider > the following two sets of simple class definitions: > > -- SET 1 -- > class inner { > protected: >unsigned a; >unsigned b; >