Hi everyone,
Is it possible to have multiple modules linking to one single pyd file? I'm
using SWIG with VS2010 and I can't find a way of doing that.
Thank you,
Olivier
___
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mail
On Nov 15, 2011 8:53 AM, "Olivier Voyer" wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Is it possible to have multiple modules linking to one single pyd file?
I'm using SWIG with VS2010 and I can't find a way of doing that.
>
I believe this is not supported by the Python C-API itself, regardless of
what wrapper ge
Jim, thank you for your answer.
What if I have this big C++ project that I cannot split in multiple smaller
projects? I have no choice but to create a big Python module exposing all
the functions/classes? What is the common practice?
Regards,
Olivier
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Jim Bosch
Le 15 nov. 2011 à 15:24, Jim Bosch a écrit :
> On Nov 15, 2011 8:53 AM, "Olivier Voyer" wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Is it possible to have multiple modules linking to one single pyd file? I'm
> > using SWIG with VS2010 and I can't find a way of doing that.
> >
>
> I believe this is not
On 11/15/2011 10:00 AM, Olivier Voyer wrote:
Jim, thank you for your answer.
What if I have this big C++ project that I cannot split in multiple
smaller projects? I have no choice but to create a big Python module
exposing all the functions/classes? What is the common practice?
It sounds like
On 11/15/2011 09:51 AM, Jérôme Laheurte wrote:
But you can put several submodules in an extension module, as a
workaround (see code below). I always wondered if that was possible
with boost::python or SWIG ?
Interesting, I hadn't thought of that.
Anyhow, I believe it should be possible (but n
Yes, that's exactly what I want to do. But, from what I understand, each
module or submodule (.py file) must link to its own .pyd file, ie
module1.py -> _module1.pyd, module2.py -> _module2.pyd.
What I would really love to have is:
myPackage/
myPackage/__init__.py
myPackage/module1.py -> linked t
On 11/15/2011 03:51 PM, Jérôme Laheurte wrote:
Le 15 nov. 2011 à 15:24, Jim Bosch a écrit :
On Nov 15, 2011 8:53 AM, "Olivier Voyer" wrote:
Hi everyone,
Is it possible to have multiple modules linking to one single pyd file? I'm
using SWIG with VS2010 and I can't find a way of doing that.
On 11/15/2011 04:42 PM, Olivier Voyer wrote:
Yes, that's exactly what I want to do. But, from what I understand,
each module or submodule (.py file) must link to its own .pyd file, ie
module1.py -> _module1.pyd, module2.py -> _module2.pyd.
What I would really love to have is:
myPackage/
myPac
Bingo! But I'm not sure how to do that... at this moment I'm using SWIG as
a C++ wrapper. Do I only need to modify the __init__py file at the root of
my package?
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> On 11/15/2011 04:42 PM, Olivier Voyer wrote:
>
>> Yes, that's exactly what
On 11/15/2011 04:52 PM, Olivier Voyer wrote:
Bingo! But I'm not sure how to do that... at this moment I'm using
SWIG as a C++ wrapper. Do I only need to modify the __init__py file at
the root of my package?
Personally I don't have a single .py file for my extensions, I just drop
in a single m
Le 15 nov. 2011 à 16:20, Jim Bosch a écrit :
> On 11/15/2011 10:00 AM, Olivier Voyer wrote:
>> Jim, thank you for your answer.
>>
>> What if I have this big C++ project that I cannot split in multiple
>> smaller projects? I have no choice but to create a big Python module
>> exposing all the fun
Le 15 nov. 2011 à 16:08, Wichert Akkerman a écrit :
> On 11/15/2011 03:51 PM, Jérôme Laheurte wrote:
>> Le 15 nov. 2011 à 15:24, Jim Bosch a écrit :
>>
>>> On Nov 15, 2011 8:53 AM, "Olivier Voyer" wrote:
Hi everyone,
Is it possible to have multiple modules linking to one single
Le 15 nov. 2011 à 17:15, Jérôme Laheurte a écrit :
>
> Le 15 nov. 2011 à 16:20, Jim Bosch a écrit :
>
>> On 11/15/2011 10:00 AM, Olivier Voyer wrote:
>>> Jim, thank you for your answer.
>>>
>>> What if I have this big C++ project that I cannot split in multiple
>>> smaller projects? I have no
On 15 Nov 2011 at 10:00, Olivier Voyer wrote:
> What if I have this big C++ project that I cannot split in multiple smaller
> projects? I have no choice but to create a big Python module exposing all
> the functions/classes? What is the common practice?
You are aware, I assume, that the python wr
On 11/14/2011 09:54 PM, Per Knudsgaard wrote:
I have gotten (3) to work, but I am wondering about two things.
Since I couldn't get the constructor to work, I went for a modifier
that returns the object.
Sorry no one responded to your questions earlier. I havne't looked too
closely yet, but I th
Thanks for your answer.
I generally prefer intrusive pointers for a number of reasons: They are
safer (no problems converting between raw and managed). They are generally
faster (no cache misses because the reference count is embedded in your
object). They don't require extra allocatio
17 matches
Mail list logo
