Hello,
let me start by thanking everybody who's behind Boost.Python and Py++,
these projects are really awesome.
I read that Py++ (and/or Boost.Python) has a native support for some
C++ containers, and that others can be added using indexing suites [
http://www.language-binding.net/pyplusplus/docu
Hello,
I noticed that some Py++ traits for standard containers are missing a
few methods that I think would be needed.
For example `set_traits' (container traits for `std::set') is missing
`method_len' that, in my opinion, should be provided.
Is this a feature or a bug? And in the former case, how
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Roman Yakovenko
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 5:41 PM, peoro wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I noticed that some Py++ traits for standard containers are missing a
>> few methods that I think would be needed.
>> For example `set_traits' (con
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Roman Yakovenko
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 6:22 PM, peoro wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Roman Yakovenko
>> wrote:
>>> Did you try len( x )?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, I tried and it isn't working.
>
Hello,
I'm having some issues with shared_ptr's in a Python environment: it
looks like once a shared_ptr enters Python, it cannot be upcasted nor
downcasted.
Here's a brief C++ source code to explain better the issue:
#include
class Base { };
class Derived : public Base { };
boost::shared_pt
x27;s, but from Python I
see them at the "derivation level" they were when I passed them to
python the first time (look at the summarized output in my previous
message)...
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Jim Bosch wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 21:31 +0100, peoro wrote:
>>
w it looks like this doesn't depend on py++: py++ always
generates the same boost::python code no matter of destructor's
virtuality.
...What if I cannot add a virtual function to the class Base?
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Roman Yakovenko
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 4
ck: prior to pass a shared_ptr to Python for the first time, I just
pass it to Python casted to its most-derived class.
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Nat Goodspeed wrote:
> peoro wrote:
>
>> Ok, it does work as expected if class Base has got at least one virtual
>> member:
