Re: McVeigh did not reach burden for delay - June 4, 2001

On Mon, 4 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So what? You think anybody gives a shit about the constitution anymore? Actually, quite a few people. -- "...where annual election ends, tyranny begins;"

Re: McVeigh did not reach burden for delay - June 4, 2001

day, June 05, 2001 8:02 AM Subject: Re: McVeigh did not reach burden for delay - June 4, 2001 > > On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Jim Choate wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > So what? You think anybody gives a shit about the constitution any

CNN.com - U.S. says McVeigh did not reach burden for delay - June 4, 2001

When did they change the standard from 'reasonable doubt'? http://www.cnn.com/2001/LAW/06/04/mcveigh.documents.03/index.html -- -- "...where annual election ends, tyranny begins;"

Re: CDR: Re: McVeigh did not reach burden for delay - June 4, 2001

On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Jim Choate wrote: > On Mon, 4 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996. > > > > Specifically: > > > > A petitioner asserting his actual innocence of the underlying crime must > > show "it is more likely than not