On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 06:00:51PM -0700, A.Melon wrote:
I don't care about The Rat's postings like some of
my anonymous associates, but someone's razor
reporting is inaccurate. Some spam from this list
has been revoked at razor so it drops down below
30% confidence, when it shouldn't be
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 04:32:23PM +1200, Peter Gutmann wrote:
James A. Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I never figured out how to use a certificate to authenticate a client to a
web server, how to make a web form available to one client and not another.
Where do I start?
There's a
- Forwarded message from Eric Blossom [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 13:25:50 -0700
From: Eric Blossom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Orig-To: John Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], EKR [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Scott Guthery
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Rich Salz
- Forwarded message from Paul Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Subject: Re: BIS Disk Full
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 22:50:20 -0700
Thread-Topic: Re: BIS Disk Full
Thread-Index: AcMpAGDW0rLn6AHCQFSmRRWCM9LG7QAkdTWg
From: Paul Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Orig-To: Declan
PROTECTED]
CC: EKR [EMAIL PROTECTED], Eric Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Scott Guthery
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Rich Salz [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Bill
Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED], cypherpunks [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Maybe It's Snake Oil All the Way Down
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 10:09:06AM -0400, Ian Grigg wrote:
A lot of the tools and blocks are too hard to
understand. Inaccessible might be the proper
term. This might apply to, for example, SSL,
and more so to IPSec. These have a lower survival
rate, simply because as developers look at
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 06:08:49PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#From: Greg Broiles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#To: Harmon Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#Date: Fri, 22 Jun 01 16:49PM EDT
#Subject: Re: The Art of Submarine Warfare
#
#
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 07:43:21PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#Subject: Re: The Art of Submarine Warfare
#Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:11:35 -0700
#From: Eric Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#
#There's no cpunks mail in the queue at lne
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 11:18:14AM -0400, Trei, Peter wrote:
This is a wonderful example of the Choate's
inability to engage in coherent discussion,
and to assume that any reference must be
to himself. It also demonstrates his
incompetence re cryptography.
The 'amusing claim' I refer
