if the signal is your own, and it would not exit the home
by its own force, you have a reasonable expectation of
privacy by a 9-0 vote of about any SCt since Taft died.
Well, 7-2 anyway.
However, if the signals are from outside, received in the
home (isn't that what Wright was after?), the issue
I think it's a typo. I think Declan meant
reputation punishing tool.
If he didn't, he should have. Good riddance
to bad rubbish--though, as I suppose would Declan
or even Choate, I'd defend the bastard's right to
be a bastard, so long as he's willing to pay up
when he causes real damage--or j
Whoa. commie privacy leftie punks? what was ORBS?
And we don't have to talk about holding guns to
heads. We're talking about holding a boycott
to heads. Sounds pretty commie leftie to me.
Talk about sheeple, jeez.
MacN
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote:
> Nobody's holding a gun to yo
Your friend is largely correct, but there are some important
exceptions to his general principles that may be troublesome.
For instance, "every man has an obligation to give his
evidence." It's one of those "citizenship" things, but it
applies to mere residents as well. Granted, nationwide
subpo
The problem is, the state has no right to keep you from
getting my SSN, or eye color or hair color or height or
penis length. But the state has no obligation to assist
you in doing so. Cox says nothing, absolutely nothing,
about compelled disclosures. Not a damn thing.
Yes, Cox is clear, if a
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Tim May wrote:
> I think there are multiple reasons for the current trends in the
> music business. The MP3/recordable CD technology effect is only one
> of the reasons, and, IMO, not nearly the most important.
It's not a reason for the trends, it *is* a trend. Get the
di
