Re: [Crash-utility] Problem in bt for ARM64

2017-10-13 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
Dave, On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 03:06:00PM -0400, Dave Anderson wrote: > > Jan, > > I went back to creating a machdep->machspec->user_eframe_offset value > to be able to account for both the 4.7 and the upcoming 4.14 pt_regs > changes: > > > https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/commit/c97500

Re: [Crash-utility] Problem in bt for ARM64

2017-10-13 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
And please note that THREAD_SIZE, hence IRQ_STACK_SIZE, is no longer constant since v4.14 due to KASAN and VMAP_STACK. -Takahiro AKASHI On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 05:29:12PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > Dave, > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 03:06:00PM -0400, Dave Anderson wrote: > > > > Jan, > > >

Re: [Crash-utility] Problem in bt for ARM64

2017-10-13 Thread Dave Anderson
Hi Takahiro, Welcome back! It's great to get you back in the fold again... I just ran a quick test of your patch on a set of sample dumpfiles, and only found one issue. It was on a 4.2 QEMU dump where all of the active tasks were running in user-space, and all of their "bt" commands fail imme