Hi,
This mail is somewhat colored by the fact that i contribute to one of
the small MyGraphicsProject.org-projects. I hope everyone can cope :)
On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 13:18 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
> Dave Crossland wrote:
> > I'd generally agree with this, but I think LGM has been consistent at
>
2008/11/10 Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi,
>
> Mostly good stuff - I just wanted to bounce back on one point:
>
> Louis Desjardins wrote:
> > I slightly disagree with no call for presentations because then how do
> > we get fresh blood in? But I do agree that we can all activate our
> > netwo
Hi,
Mostly good stuff - I just wanted to bounce back on one point:
Louis Desjardins wrote:
> I slightly disagree with no call for presentations because then how do
> we get fresh blood in? But I do agree that we can all activate our
> networks and find some good projects and invite those people.
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
> How many talks do you want to have? In the first LGM, we had (including
> lightning talks) 11 talks in 2 days.
>
> We probably could have fit more - up to 15 - without sacrificing the
> format. We left too long between presentations, I think, f
2008/11/8 Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi,
>
> Dave Crossland wrote:
> > I'd generally agree with this, but I think LGM has been consistent at
> > packing out 3+-1 days with quality presentations the last few years.
> >
> > I think JP's suggestion about more focus is worth thinking about,
> >
