Well if we latched on, stealing another conference's thunder would be
better, but there is NO way like 90% of the people could attend our
conference for 3-4 days and then another one for another 3-5 days!
I think we just go it alone, brussels, hammer it, rock. FOSDEM or
GUADEC are the main ones to
On 05/13/2009 02:57 PM, Craig Bradney wrote:
> We all agreed last year for 2009, that hanging LGM off another event
> dilutes the interest for LGM and takes away from it more than it gives.
But in this economy[1] it make sense. Less travel means more potential
attendance. Just make it after or b
Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> Louis Desjardins wrote:
>
>> Also, look forward very much to proposal(s) for the conference for
>> next year. How about these get in by June 1st?
>>
>>
>> I would strongly suggest that we make the decision of next year’s venue
>> by May 31st.
>>
>
Hahahaha...you guys are great! All sounds good to me.
Jon Phillips
+1.415.830.3884 (global)
+86.132.6817.8381 (beijing)
j...@rejon.org
On May 13, 2009 6:50 AM, "alessandro rimoldi" wrote:
hello create list,
[...]
> much text with many good ideas
[...]
full ACK!
i will have to leave soon, but
On 05/13/2009 02:01 PM, Leonard Rosenthol wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
>
>> Reading archived file is not interchange.
>>
>
> Nor is having the file format documentation a solution for long term
> archiving.
The problem is that as soon as you offer the possibil
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Leonard Rosenthol wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
>>
>> Reading archived file is not interchange.
>
> Nor is having the file format documentation a solution for long term
> archiving.
Leonard,
We are talking here about being comp
[Putting back the list in CC as you mistakenly left it out. ]
On 05/13/2009 01:56 PM, Leonard Rosenthol wrote:
> That is correct. Just as we did with PDF, we are focused on documenting the
> file format (aka SWF) and not the behavior of "conforming readers" (to use
> the ISO PDF terminology). T
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
> Reading archived file is not interchange.
>
Nor is having the file format documentation a solution for long term
archiving.
As Project Leader for ISO 19005 (PDF/A), I've spent a LOT of time with
archivists, librarians and the like to un
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> GIMP developers (just like John) have also stated before that they do
> not want PSD
So much for freudian slips :) Of course I was meaning to say meant
XCF. Sorry about that :)
Alexandre
__
On 05/13/2009 12:41 PM, Leonard Rosenthol wrote:
> If you, they, or anyone else have specific comments, questions, concerns
> about our published specifications for SWF, PLEASE submit them through the
> OpenScreen project! The current docs are our first attempt at trying to
> document "all that i
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Leonard Rosenthol wrote:
> The problem with PSD, at this time, is that it is distributed as part of the
> Photoshop SDK. The SDK includes OTHER material that requires NDA, so folks
> who just want the PSD format docs end up in an unfortunate situation. I
> contin
On 05/13/2009 12:39 PM, Leonard Rosenthol wrote:
> The problem with PSD, at this time, is that it is distributed as part of the
> Photoshop SDK. The SDK includes OTHER material that requires NDA, so folks
> who just want the PSD format docs end up in an unfortunate situation. I
> continue to work
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine <
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Leonard Rosenthol wrote:
>
> > others can read & write our formats. All of our major formats, and most
> of
> > our minor ones, are documented in this fashion - SWF,
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
> On 05/13/2009 05:00 AM, Leonard Rosenthol wrote:
>
>> Our philosophy at Adobe, with respect to file formats and standardization,
>> is that we will publish the details of file format specifications so that
>> others can read& write our f
On 05/13/2009 11:34 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> And while I'm at that, is it legal to use parts of DNG SDK in GPL/LGPL
> software?
Not according to the license. I think I have already requested that, but
got no answer beside a "what for?" in the Adobe forums. The license used
by the XMP_S
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Leonard Rosenthol wrote:
>
>> others can read & write our formats. All of our major formats, and most of
>> our minor ones, are documented in this fashion - SWF, IDML, Mars/PDFXML,
>> XMP, PSD, etc.
>
>
On 05/13/2009 05:00 AM, Leonard Rosenthol wrote:
> Our philosophy at Adobe, with respect to file formats and standardization,
> is that we will publish the details of file format specifications so that
> others can read& write our formats. All of our major formats, and most of
> our minor ones, a
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Jon Phillips wrote:
> Hi all, Alexandre and others who were posting videos and photos, can
> you reply to this email with links to your opictures and accounts.
As if http://www.flickr.com/groups/776...@n22/ wasn't the advertized
public Flickr group :)
Alexandre
_
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Leonard Rosenthol wrote:
> others can read & write our formats. All of our major formats, and most of
> our minor ones, are documented in this fashion - SWF, IDML, Mars/PDFXML,
> XMP, PSD, etc.
Excuse me, are you saying that specification for the current PSD
vers
Hi all,
Louis Desjardins wrote:
> Also, look forward very much to proposal(s) for the conference for
> next year. How about these get in by June 1st?
>
>
> I would strongly suggest that we make the decision of next year’s venue
> by May 31st.
...
> Sounds like Burssels is
> th
wow, I'm never typing on my phone again. sorry about that.
And thanks for the clarification Leonard.
So, its a good guess that free software wont have influence in the
making of this format (for the benefit of its own features) But the
good news is its likely that if documented enough, we'll b
hello create list,
[...]
> much text with many good ideas
[...]
full ACK!
i will have to leave soon, but i will try to summerize it in the create wiki
ciao
a.l.e
___
CREATE mailing list
CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman
alessandro rimoldi a écrit :
> buondì louis e jon,
Bonjour Ale et Jon!
>
>> I would strongly suggest that we make the decision of next year’s
>> venue by May 31st.
>>
>> Following, a series of actions to be taken:
>>
>> 1) Issue a first press release on the city. A second one when the
>> dates ar
On Wednesday 13 May 2009, Leonard Rosenthol wrote:
> Our philosophy at Adobe, with respect to file formats and standardization,
> is that we will publish the details of file format specifications so that
> others can read & write our formats. All of our major formats, and most of
> our minor ones,
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Andy Fitzsimon wrote:
> Reckon there's a frantion of a chance they make this an open
> unrestricted standard?
>
At some point in the future, if the format has become important enough to
the industry, most certainly.
Our philosophy at Adobe, with respect to file
buondì louis e jon,
> I would strongly suggest that we make the decision of next year’s
> venue by May 31st.
>
> Following, a series of actions to be taken:
>
> 1) Issue a first press release on the city. A second one when the
> dates are known and a third one when the venue (the uni) is known,
26 matches
Mail list logo
