Am 16.10.09, 18:14 +0200 schrieb i...@textzi.net:
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
...
>> gives some kind of idea, but again, I don't see the whole thing and I
>> wonder who else does.
>
> I wonder the same. Please report any problems :)
>
> Ivan
The background see
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Dave Neary wrote:
> One thing I think that the next LGM could do is to make it an artists
> convention, where the developers are invited - I'd love to see a
> presentation schedule with just artists showing off their tools, and
> have as many people from DeviantArt
Stani wrote:
> I am really happy with all the positive energy of the current LGM
> participation. I remember to read all mails by Femke and co, and
> thought "Wow, the next LGM will be great!" I am afraid however that
> the discussion of the new website is mixing "How do you like this
> website?"
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Ivan wrote:
>
>>> JavaScript in question didn't actually work for me, and I'm using
>>> Firefox 3.5, mind you :) So I can't really say anything about design,
>>> because I simply don't see it. I do see
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Ivan wrote:
>> JavaScript in question didn't actually work for me, and I'm using
>> Firefox 3.5, mind you :) So I can't really say anything about design,
>> because I simply don't see it. I do see
>> http://lgm.alexandreleray.com/static/css/background-fixe.svg at
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
>
>>> Euh... because these particular three squares make an M for Meeting and
>>> also a flag :-)
>>
>> Is good you said that. I would never figure this out all by myself :)
>
> That was probably somewhat harsh from me. To make it clear
I am really happy with all the positive energy of the current LGM
participation. I remember to read all mails by Femke and co, and
thought "Wow, the next LGM will be great!" I am afraid however that
the discussion of the new website is mixing "How do you like this
website?" with "Should we profile
Yuval Levy wrote:
> @Femke: sorry, I don't see the dependency. And I can't conenct with the
> meaning that you are trying to give to the squares. If for you it is
> mandatory, go ahead, have your event. You'll sure do better than what I
> would do (cleartext: nothing).
Nothing mandatory; just t
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
>> Euh... because these particular three squares make an M for Meeting and
>> also a flag :-)
>
> Is good you said that. I would never figure this out all by myself :)
That was probably somewhat harsh from me. To make it clear: I care
a
my previous message had a too large attachment and did not come through.
peter wrote:
> My modest opinion is that the ink-splash does not represent creative
> work in the digital age
I've been asked for feedback about website and logo and have given it.
I've also stated that I have no particula
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Femke Snelting wrote:
>> Same.. 3 squares - why 3? why blue? why not 3 red circles? or 4?
>> Abstract can be great, but this seems excessive. At least *something*
>> relating to open source & graphics would be nice.
>
> Euh... because these particular three squares
11 matches
Mail list logo
