Re: [CREATE] CREATE Digest, Vol 55, Issue 10

Am Freitag, 22. Januar 2010 05:56:11 schrieb Jon Cruz: > On Jan 22, 2010, at 5:06 AM, Cyrille Berger wrote: > > Ok, I will clarify my opinion. I agree that swatchbook is more than just > > colors, that includes gradient, pattern, brushes, etc... And that we > > currently have no easy way to exchang

Re: [CREATE] SwatchBooker 0.5

On Jan 22, 2010, at 5:13 AM, Cyrille Berger wrote: > What are the choice ? I think we would aim to use things like RDF/XMP, but > neither of them are "simples", so I don't know if we should not also have a > simple metadata spec that we can reuse (something based on dublin core, > maybe). Per

Re: [CREATE] CREATE Digest, Vol 55, Issue 10

On Jan 22, 2010, at 5:06 AM, Cyrille Berger wrote: > Ok, I will clarify my opinion. I agree that swatchbook is more than just > colors, that includes gradient, pattern, brushes, etc... And that we > currently > have no easy way to exchange swatchbook, between users, and applications. So > we

Re: [CREATE] SwatchBooker 0.5

On Jan 22, 2010, at 6:33 AM, Olivier BERTEN wrote: > I understand the validation point but I'm not really sure of the interest in > validating data... since would validate but > it wouldn't make any sense... but it might be my bad knowledge of xml ;-) No, it wouldn't really validate as long a

Re: [CREATE] lgm/talks

ping. I'm trying to plan travel for FOSDEM. On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Louis Desjardins wrote: > > > 2010/1/19 Jon Phillips >> >> Excellent, here is the link: >> >> http://create.freedesktop.org/wiki/Conference > > Femke, > > Can you please add the confirmed dates on the header in the wiki

Re: [CREATE] CREATE Digest, Vol 55, Issue 10

Am 22.01.10, 01:44 +1300 schrieb Jon Cruz: > On Jan 21, 2010, at 8:06 PM, Cyrille Berger wrote: > >>> I think we'll also need gradients and tagging to go with that. Without, it >>> is good for programmers but not end users/artists. >> I think everyone agrees on that, the colors spec has always just

Re: [CREATE] SwatchBooker 0.5

Cyrille Berger a écrit : On Thursday 21 January 2010, Olivier BERTEN wrote: There's a mix of different reasons, the least not being my lack of knowledge of XML and programming skills... I first went from to simply because it was easier to deal with different color models the same way (you

Re: [CREATE] OpenRaster reference library - libora

> All of krita is written in C++ and using QtXML, I don't think anything can be > used. Ok. no problem. Some performance improving ideas are still welcome (I have found out that writing zip files is slow even when removing all the python wrappers and intermediate files that are used in mypaint ...

Re: [CREATE] SwatchBooker 0.5

On Thursday 21 January 2010, Olivier BERTEN wrote: > There's a mix of different reasons, the least not being my lack of > knowledge of XML and programming skills... > > I first went from to simply > because it was easier to deal with different color models the same way > (you were talking about

Re: [CREATE] CREATE Digest, Vol 55, Issue 10

On Thursday 21 January 2010, Jon Cruz wrote: > On Jan 21, 2010, at 8:06 PM, Cyrille Berger wrote: > >> I think we'll also need gradients and tagging to go with that. Without, > >> it is good for programmers but not end users/artists. > > > > I think everyone agrees on that, the colors spec has alwa

Re: [CREATE] OpenRaster reference library - libora

On Thursday 21 January 2010, you wrote: > >> So far I have left out filters and such, because I am not aware (call > >> me ignorant if you wish) of any application that would use them very > >> intensively. > > > > Well krita does since 1.5, and next version of Gimp will. But, both of > > them migh

Re: [CREATE] SwatchBooker 0.5

On Jan 21, 2010, at 11:57 PM, Olivier BERTEN wrote: > I first went from to simply > because it was easier to deal with different color models the same way (you > were talking about laziness ;-) ) > Then, as I wanted to add 6CLR (and more), it didn't work anymore since an xml > element can't

Re: [CREATE] CREATE Digest, Vol 55, Issue 10

On Jan 21, 2010, at 8:06 PM, Cyrille Berger wrote: >> I think we'll also need gradients and tagging to go with that. Without, it >> is good for programmers but not end users/artists. > I think everyone agrees on that, the colors spec has always just being only a > starting point. Well... no. Th

Re: [CREATE] OpenRaster reference library - libora

>> >> So far I have left out filters and such, because I am not aware (call >> me ignorant if you wish) of any application that would use them very >> intensively. > Well krita does since 1.5, and next version of Gimp will. But, both of them > might not be the main customers of your library, at lea

Re: [CREATE] SwatchBooker 0.5

There's a mix of different reasons, the least not being my lack of knowledge of XML and programming skills... I first went from to simply because it was easier to deal with different color models the same way (you were talking about laziness ;-) ) Then, as I wanted to add 6CLR (and more), it

Re: [CREATE] OpenRaster reference library - libora

On Thursday 21 January 2010, Luka Čehovin wrote: > Thanks for your reply > > > As for the missing bits, or underspecified part of the spec. Best is to > > ask for clarification on the list. Many of them are actually crucial for > > Krita (and most likely for a geglified gimp), but are not easy to

Re: [CREATE] OpenRaster reference library - libora

Thanks for your reply > > As for the missing bits, or underspecified part of the spec. Best is to ask > for > clarification on the list. Many of them are actually crucial for Krita (and > most likely for a geglified gimp), but are not easy to do right. Also not > helping, OpenRaster has fell from

Re: [CREATE] SwatchBooker 0.5

On Thursday 21 January 2010, Olivier BERTEN wrote: > Well... I started 2 years ago with the CREATE format > > but it didn't completely fit my needs. And since it hasn't been changed > nor did it leave his "draft" status since

Re: [CREATE] SwatchBooker 0.5

Well... I started 2 years ago with the CREATE format but it didn't completely fit my needs. And since it hasn't been changed nor did it leave his "draft" status since then, I slowly got to have my own format. By the way,