Re: [CREATE] Fw: [scribus] Swatchbooker project needs some help

2016-01-16 Thread Kai-Uwe Behrmann
Am 16.01.2016 um 09:59 schrieb Boudewijn Rempt: >> https://phabricator.kde.org/T112 > The link should be open now... Phabricator is still a bit experimental. thanks > By the way, on the subject of resources -- I'd really like to move to a > more modern resource format for everything, one that

Re: [CREATE] Fw: [scribus] Swatchbooker project needs some help

2016-01-16 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
The link should be open now... Phabricator is still a bit experimental. By the way, on the subject of resources -- I'd really like to move to a more modern resource format for everything, one that includes at least a GUID for every resource. On Sat, 16 Jan 2016, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: Ah,

Re: [CREATE] Fw: [scribus] Swatchbooker project needs some help

2016-01-16 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
Ah, that's where the project went! We actually have improving palettes on our todo for the next release: https://phabricator.kde.org/T112 And I thought the swatchbooker project was dead. I'm mainly interested in the file format, though, not directly in the Python gui. But I'll try to take a

[CREATE] Fw: [scribus] Swatchbooker project needs some help

2016-01-15 Thread Christoph Schäfer
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. Januar 2016 um 19:57 Uhr > Von: "Scribus User" > An: "Scribus User Mailing List" > Betreff: [scribus] Swatchbooker project needs some help > > Swatchbooker has been discussed recently as a game changing tool for >