Re: [Crm-sig] NEW ISSUE: Approximate Dimensions

(Snipping to avoid the list’s length filter) I agree that it would be lovely if everyone recorded the measurement activities in detail, including with margins of error. But this isn’t a physics documentation group, it’s museums. That others do it better than we do is great, but doesn’t address

Re: [Crm-sig] NEW ISSUE: Approximate Dimensions

Dear Robert, On 10/16/2019 9:39 PM, Robert Sanderson wrote: Yes, that makes sense, thank you. One further observation… > The same reasoning holds for many dimensions, but there is no typical practice as vague as that of providing a point near a place. I think there’s some very similar prac

[Crm-sig] part of HW for Issue 412

Hello, Most of this is for Francesco and Vincent, but I had a small part of the homework which was to add a sentence to the introductory text to clarify that CRMsoc is under development. So here is the text again with the added sentence in the end: ---

[Crm-sig] Upcoming sig Meeting 22-25 October (& Workshop on Historical Content Metadata)

Hello everyone, This is a reminder for the upcoming sig meeting plus the workshop on historical content metadata. _*(a) Sig meeting -related information: *_ The meeting will be hosted by FORTH .