Re: [Crm-sig] Is P181 has amount different from P90 has value?

On 8/20/2020 10:08 AM, Francesco Beretta wrote: Dear Rob, all, I agree with you and wonder why this property was added. Deleted in the last SIG. Please check 7.0 :-) Best wishes Francesco Le 06.12.19 à 21:48, Robert Sanderson a écrit : Dear all, Is P181_has_amount really a useful prope

Re: [Crm-sig] Is P181 has amount different from P90 has value?

Dear Rob, all, I agree with you and wonder why this property was added. Best wishes Francesco Le 06.12.19 à 21:48, Robert Sanderson a écrit : Dear all, Is P181_has_amount really a useful property, compared to its super-property of P90_has_value? They both take numbers, 181 is a subproper

[Crm-sig] CRM 6.2.9 published ? – Re: New Erlangen OWL Version based on CIDOC CRM 6.2.9

Dear Mark, all, Considering the documentation about the CRM 6.2.9 version, I see that it is mentioned as published on the website, but there's no RDF(S) file available there (unusual for a published version) and in the PDF you can still read: "Editorial Status: In Progress since [30/04/2020]",