Check this https://cidoc-crm.org/Issue/ID-191-range-of-p31
(https://cidoc-crm.org/Issue/ID-191-range-of-p31) I think it is an old issue
related with the range
best
Athina
___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/li
Ahh, thank you, I understand now. Well, the scope notes of the various
classes and properties should be improved to make that clear if it's the
case.
And then we would need to have the discussion about how to remove fragments
from meteorites, so I hope that's _not_ the case :D
R
On Tue, Nov 30,
I completely understand the reasoning and I agree that intuitively a
tree with a broken branch is a diminished thing. It is just that the
scope note and all of the examples in E80 Part Removal are for
Human-Made things so I worry that the class has been designed for
Human-Made things only, i.e.
It makes sense for the twig from the branch, but not from the branch from
the tree (or stalactite from the cave, fragment for study from a meteorite,
etc etc).
Removing the branch/fragment from the tree/meteorite results in a
Human-Made Object (via the Part Removal / Production), but the
tree/meter
Hm, I do not consider it as a value statement, but as indication of the
intension. Breaking a tree branch which is worth putting in your
collection is a production of a Human-Made Object (as well as a
Biological Object). So when you break the twig off the branch, you are
removing a part from a
