Dear Philip, all,
Thank you for the interest. We will (very) soon publish the first version
of the SeaLiT Ontology (together with an rdfs implementation of it).
We are happy to present it during the next SIG meeting, get feedback, and
also discuss how it could be extended to cover the needs of yo
Dear all, Philip
Actually this work was meant for Pavlov, so by mistake it was sent to the list.
It is an ongoing
project, not published yet, but I am really happy that some of you find it
really interesting - we
can discuss this and we can always exchange opinions of course
Best
Athina
Decemb
In which case I suppose the proposal to discuss at the next SIG is:
1) change the range of P112 from E24 Physical Human-Made Thing to E18
Physical Thing
2) fix the reference to the property under the scope note of E80
3) add an example to E80 and a corresponding example to P112 for
non-man-mad
