Re: [Crm-sig] More .1 Questions CRMArchaeo

2022-03-23 Thread Martin Doerr via Crm-sig
Dear George, Please send an issue to the list. We need a policy for all extensions. Best, Martin On 3/23/2022 3:24 PM, George Bruseker via Crm-sig wrote: Dear all, I am also wondering about implementing .1 constructs in CRM Archaeo. Although CRM Archaeo declares .1 properties that are

Re: [Crm-sig] Call for e-vote: LRMoo R26

2022-03-23 Thread Martin Doerr via Crm-sig
I vote YES. Martin On 3/20/2022 10:32 PM, Pat Riva via Crm-sig wrote: Hello all, Continuing with issues partially discussed but not actually voted at SIG#52 in February. In the document for Issue 360: HW: F28 Expression Creation

[Crm-sig] More .1 Questions CRMArchaeo

2022-03-23 Thread George Bruseker via Crm-sig
Dear all, I am also wondering about implementing .1 constructs in CRM Archaeo. Although CRM Archaeo declares .1 properties that are actually essential to its implementation, those properties are not (I believe) expressed in the RDF that comes with CRM Archaeo. Is there a hidden PC file for CRM

Re: [Crm-sig] Call for e-vote: LRMoo R26

2022-03-23 Thread Žumer , Maja via Crm-sig
YES. Maja Od: Crm-sig v imenu Pat Riva via Crm-sig Poslano: nedelja, 20. marec 2022 21:32 Za: CRM-SIG Zadeva: [Crm-sig] Call for e-vote: LRMoo R26 Hello all, Continuing with issues partially discussed but not actually voted at SIG#52 in February. In the