Hi,
I'm working on the representation of literary works (LWs) using the CRM
core and the LRMoo. I've made every LW, or any part of it, an instance
of both E33_Linguistic_Object and F2_Expression. I'm interested in
describing the syntactic structure of a LW, so by "part" I do not mean
just cha
Dear Philippe,
Thank you for the interesting discussion.
Here is my understanding: (note: I was not involved when the PCs were first
introduced)
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 9:52 PM Philippe Michon via Crm-sig <
crm-sig@ics.forth.gr> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I strongly second this proposal. In my opini
Dear Philippe, all,
I agree with Pavlos' explanations.
The PC classes are not an ontological construct. They are not CRM
Entities, and therefore P2_has_type does not apply. I do not think Scope
Notes in the sense we use in the CRM are required for
PC0_Typed_CRM_Property", "P01_has_domain", an
