Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Delete Unnecessary / Incorrect Classes of CRMdig

2022-11-01 Thread Martin Doerr via Crm-sig
Hi George, To avoid confusion, please mark an e-vote request with "PLEASE VOTE" in the subject line. Best, Martin On 11/1/2022 11:53 AM, George Bruseker via Crm-sig wrote: Dear all, I propose the deletion of the following classes of CRMdig. The reason that each should be deleted is listed

[Crm-sig] ISSUE: Delete Unnecessary / Incorrect Classes of CRMdig

2022-11-01 Thread George Bruseker via Crm-sig
Dear all, I propose the deletion of the following classes of CRMdig. The reason that each should be deleted is listed beside it, but there are two basic, principled reasons for the proposal: 1) the class can be modelled using a more generic pattern from CRMbase or CRMdig without loss of semantic

[Crm-sig] ISSUE: Delete Unnecessary / Incorrect Properties of CRMdig

2022-11-01 Thread George Bruseker via Crm-sig
Dear all, I propose the deletion of the following properties of CRMdig. The reason that each should be deleted is listed beside it, but there are two basic, principled reasons for the proposal: 1) the property can be modelled using a more generic pattern from CRMbase or CRMdig without loss of sem

[Crm-sig] CRMdig Issues Backgrounder

2022-11-01 Thread George Bruseker via Crm-sig
Dear all, I am writing this as a preface to a number of emails that I hope I will be sending through to the list over the next while regarding CRMdig. Following the last SIG meeting in Rome, a decision was made to try to move forward with doing a general review of CRMdig both to check its general