[Crm-sig] NEW ISSUE: Core and Application Models

Dear All, From the beginning of the CRM development, we followed a clear distinction between "core model" and "application model", as has been, in similar form, be proposed by other authors as well. The basic idea is that the wealth of phenomena , even for the domain of factual information

Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 588 Implementing the .1 Properties of Base and Extensions in RDF

Dear Francesco, All, I support this new issue. The discussion about the .1 properties had been very long, but the reasoning is, as for many solutions the CRM offers, widely lost. New methods arise, as the reification construct. I just want to remind, that the issue splits into a set of

[Crm-sig] Homework for Issue 628: redo learning diagrams

Dear all, An open homework relates to updating the diagrams in the Use and Learn section to accord with CRM 7.1.1. On the road to that goal, we have had a first pass at re-representing the extant diagrams in an updated style using draw.io . You can find the link to this work here:

Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE Implementing .2 Properties in RDF

Dear Pavlos and all, Pavlos thank you very much for the proposal of the formal approach for the .2 PC classes for CRMarchaeo. As I never worked with the PC classes this helps a lot for the issue raised in the CRMarchaeo group, that we never formalised .2 properties. As for the discussion that

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for CRMtex 2.0

YES And thank you to all of you, that is most relevant for our linguistic and historic projects! Von: Crm-sig im Auftrag von Pavlos Fafalios via Crm-sig Antworten an: Pavlos Fafalios Datum: Dienstag, 25. April 2023 um 12:30 An: crm-sig Betreff: [Crm-sig] E-vote for CRMtex 2.0 Dear all, We

[Crm-sig] Homework for Issue 533

Dear all, Our homework for Issue 533 can be found in the following shared folder: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/11RV8bL6tM8KTuYvlxIraK45XK2X3zcMt?usp=share_link (issue folder for the