.forth.gr]" im Auftrag von "martin [
> mar...@ics.forth.gr]
> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 22. September 2016 19:56
> *An:* Simon Spero
> *Cc:* crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
> *Betreff:* Re: [Crm-sig] Associative relationship mapping
>
> On 22/9/2016 8:48 μμ, Simon Spero
forth.gr
Betreff: Re: [Crm-sig] Associative relationship mapping
On 22/9/2016 8:48 μμ, Simon Spero wrote:
If the CRM is interpreted as an OWL ontology, then the most general
relationship between two objects is owl:topObjectProperty.
This property has very weak semantics (e.g. that there is some known
Hi Philip!
I very much like Stephen's suggestion of modelling generic relationships by
reifying subsets of the museum's database records as a set of E73
Information Objects each of which *P67 refers to* a set of "generically
related" objects. The nice thing about an "Information Object" is that
This is intriguing.
I've never used the property, PX_is_related_to or PXX_is_related_to myself
and it isn't in any of my documentation. I have checked my BM mapping
manual (361 pages) and the only mention of "related to" is a BM production
association code for which the semantics have been
On 22/9/2016 8:48 μμ, Simon Spero wrote:
If the CRM is interpreted as an OWL ontology, then the most general
relationship between two objects is *owl:topObjectProperty. *
This property has very weak semantics (e.g. that there is some known
relationship between a and b).
One benefit /
If the CRM is interpreted as an OWL ontology, then the most general
relationship between two objects is *owl:topObjectProperty. *
This property has very weak semantics (e.g. that there is some known
relationship between a and b).
One benefit / problem with using this property is that it is a
bject:* [Crm-sig] Associative relationship mapping
Hi all,
The Arches project moves on a pace and is in the process of modifying
the graphs for version 4.
In the original graphs we used a British Museum extension property
(PXX_is_related_to) as a work around to allow us to represent the
gen
teads
From: Crm-sig [mailto:crm-sig-boun...@ics.forth.gr] On Behalf Of Carlisle,
Philip
Sent: 15 September 2016 11:16
To: crm-sig (Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr)
Subject: [Crm-sig] Associative relationship mapping
Hi all,
The Arches project moves on a pace and is in the process of modifying th
Hi all,
The Arches project moves on a pace and is in the process of modifying the
graphs for version 4.
In the original graphs we used a British Museum extension property
(PXX_is_related_to) as a work around to allow us to represent the general
association relationship we had in legacy
