/www.historicengland.org.uk/terms/privacy-cookies/> for more
information.
From: Crm-sig [mailto:crm-sig-boun...@ics.forth.gr] On Behalf Of Bekiari
Xrysoula
Sent: 31 January 2020 12:46
To: crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for the scope note of P2 has type (is type of)
THIS
yes
Christian-Emil
On 31/01/2020 12:46, Bekiari Xrysoula wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Following the decisions of the last sig, we invite you to vote if you
> accept the updated scope note of P2 has type . The old and the new
> scope notes follow:
>
>
Apologies, I misread the labels.
YES, without a comment.
T.
On 03/02/2020 09:35, Athanasios Velios wrote:
YES, but I would remove the work "obviously" from the last sentence.
Thanasis
On 31/01/2020 12:46, Bekiari Xrysoula wrote:
Dear All,
Following the decisions of the last sig, we invite
YES, but I would remove the work "obviously" from the last sentence.
Thanasis
On 31/01/2020 12:46, Bekiari Xrysoula wrote:
Dear All,
Following the decisions of the last sig, we invite you to vote if you
accept the updated scope note of P2 has type . The old and the new
scope notes follow:
YES
From: Crm-sig on behalf of Bekiari Xrysoula
Date: Friday, January 31, 2020 at 4:55 AM
To: "crm-sig@ics.forth.gr"
Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for the scope note of P2 has type (is type of)
Dear All,
Following the decisions of the last sig, we invite you to vote if
Yes
Richard
On 31/01/2020 12:46, Bekiari Xrysoula wrote:
Dear All,
Following the decisions of the last sig, we invite you to vote if you accept
the updated scope note of P2 has type . The old and the new scope notes follow:
Dear All,
Following the decisions of the last sig, we invite you to vote if you
accept the updated scope note of P2 has type . The old and the new
scope notes follow:
===
*P2 has type (is type of) *
