Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 623, FOL for O15

2022-12-08 Thread Christian-Emil Smith Ore via Crm-sig
The compact notation is very good. Chr-E From: Crm-sig on behalf of Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig Sent: 08 December 2022 22:05 To: crm-sig@ics.forth.gr Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 623, FOL for O15 Thank you both. I am assuming that Wolfgang's formulati

Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 623, FOL for O15

2022-12-08 Thread Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig
⇔ P156(x,y) Wolfgang Am 08.12.2022 um 15:33 schrieb Christian-Emil Smith Ore via Crm-sig : ISSUE 623, FOL for O15 I was asked to produce FOL for the sentence 'This property is equivalent to P156 occupies (is occupied by) with domain E18 Physical Thing and range E53 Place.' (m

Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 623, FOL for O15

2022-12-08 Thread Wolfgang Schmidle via Crm-sig
I would write it like this: O15(x,y) ⇒ S10(x) O15(x,y) ⇒ E53(y) O15(x,y) ∧ E18(x) ⇔ P156(x,y) Wolfgang > Am 08.12.2022 um 15:33 schrieb Christian-Emil Smith Ore via Crm-sig > : > > > ISSUE 623, FOL for O15 > > I was asked to produce FOL for the sentence 'This

[Crm-sig] ISSUE 623, FOL for O15

2022-12-08 Thread Christian-Emil Smith Ore via Crm-sig
ISSUE 623, FOL for O15 I was asked to produce FOL for the sentence 'This property is equivalent to P156 occupies (is occupied by) with domain E18 Physical Thing and range E53 Place.' (marked in green). The equivalence is that O15 implies P156 when restricted to E18. The other way round is tha