[Crm-sig] New Issue, inverse: Harmonizing CRMgeo logically with CRMbase

Dear All, From the CRMgeo side, we have two choices: Either we declare Q10 defines place Domain: E94 <#_SP5_Geometric_Place> Space Primitive Range: SP6 <#_SP6_Declarative_Place> Declarative Place *to be suproperty of P168i,* Q14 defines time Domain: SP14 <#_E61_Time_Primitive_1> Time Ex

Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue, inverse: Harmonizing CRMgeo logically with CRMbase

Dear All, From the CRMgeo side, we have two choices: Either we declare Q10 defines place Domain: E94 <#_SP5_Geometric_Place> Space Primitive Range: SP6 <#_SP6_Declarative_Place> Declarative Place *to be suproperty of P168i,* Q14 defines time Domain: SP14 <#_E61_Time_Primitive_1> Time Ex