Many thanks for everyone who gave me detailed comments.
Sure, all concepts are well documented, I only tried to find correct term in
Russian.
Because shortcut from IT is not the same word in linguistics.
If we mean predicative relationship or link, we need to find another term
because in
Dear all,
Normally the link to the description already exists, but they only use
property/classes number and they reflect CIDOC-CRM version 5.0.4
In fact, if you go to
http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/P2
you should be able to see an html version of the property description
relative to P2
Dear all,
Thanks for your feedback on this. So it sounds like there is interest in
discussing this as an issue in the next SIG.
The proposal that was in my mind was that the specification document (the
word/pdf) would also have the URL/I as a hotlink in the documentation of
the class or property
I agree with this. Shouldn't it be part of the RDF implementation document?
Thanasis
On 20/07/2021 15:37, Robert Sanderson via Crm-sig wrote:
Wholehearted agreement. Even if they're expressed in different ways by
different representations of the conceptual model, if we can standardize
the
Wholehearted agreement. Even if they're expressed in different ways by
different representations of the conceptual model, if we can standardize
the URI then an RDFS description and an OWL description of *the same URIs*
can be used by different communities without breaking interoperability. If
we
Dear all,
Many people try to use the CIDOC CRM in order to build sustainable,
reusable data sources and connect into a wider linked open data web.
When they do so, they would like to easily be able to find / use the URIs
for the classes and properties that the standard declares.
The official
