Thank you, David. I just wanted to make sure there are no changes to SR0
rules.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2013-08-15 2:12 PM, David M Williams wrote:
> If SR0 is treated differently, do you know/remember why?
Maybe I'm missing your "real question", but SR0 is a "new release", by
definition. Everyon
This is interesting…the jobs *are* getting executed, it's just that the
notification back to gerrit doesn't appear to be happening.
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=415188 Gerrit jobs not notified
of hudson build status
On 2013-08-15, at 1:32 PM, Matthias Sohn wrote:
> On Thu,
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Miles Parker wrote:
> Is anyone else noticing Gerrit build triggers not getting invoked? Looking
> at https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/q/age:1day,n,z it appears that there are
> many recent changes missing builds..
>
sandbox Hudson says:
Your Hudson data directory "/o
Is anyone else noticing Gerrit build triggers not getting invoked? Looking at
https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/q/age:1day,n,z it appears that there are many
recent changes missing builds..
Miles T. Parker | Tasktop Labs | Tasktop Technologies
email: miles.par...@tasktop.com
web: http://tasktop.co
Am 15.08.2013 um 12:01 schrieb David M Williams:
> don't forget you can always have your own calendar
Really!? Thats cool
Dennis Hübner
Xtext Commiter / Build Engineer
Mobile: +49 (0) 151 / 17 39 67 07
Telefon: +49 (0) 431 / 990 268 70
Fax: +49 (0) 431 / 990 268 72
itemis AG
Niederlassung
> as a small opensource project
> m2e does not have "our" planning counsel representative.
Ah, I did miss this implied question. I believe m2e is a member of the
Technology PMC, so your planning representative is
Chris Aniszczyk.
See following reference for complete list.
http://www.eclipse.o
> If SR0 is treated differently, do you know/remember why?
Maybe I'm missing your "real question", but SR0 is a "new release", by
definition. Everyone expects "new features" there, and the release reviews
are scheduled "as a whole" in advance, and there are deadlines for IP
Reviews, etc., estab
I assume you are joking, but if not, don't forget you can always have your
own calendar. Afraid I couldn't fit every project's own constraints and
deadlines on to one calendar.
From: Dennis Hübner
To: Cross project issues ,
Date: 08/15/2013 04:40 AM
Subject:Re: [cross-projec
Hi David,
Am 14.08.2013 um 18:55 schrieb David M Williams:
> need to be "stable", before the rest of EMF is (you know, we have one of the
> special relationships where we depend on them, and they depend on us :) ...
> yet we are +0 and they are +1, as a whole.
> For examples, see
> https://bug
HI
I missed this decision too and although it inconveniences me for SR1, I
welcome it.
Arguably SR0 has the stronger constraint of the M6 API freeze and the M7
Feature freeze. I hope these will now become meaningful.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 15/08/2013 08:02, Igor Fedorenko wrote
I certainly missed this decision (and no, as a small opensource project
m2e does not have "our" planning counsel representative).
Does the same "release one month prior to RC1" rule apply to SR0 in
June? If SR0 is treated differently, do you know/remember why?
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2013-08-14 7:3
11 matches
Mail list logo
