I think Eclipse (the Foundation) does a disservice to itself every year
with its naming scheme for Eclipse (the IDE). The word 'Eclipse' is either
a book about vampires to most people, or a fancy code editor to more
technically inclined people. While pushing all the projects to prepend
Eclipse
> I do not believe the foundation as such should restrict a specific projects
> ability to market it self as long as it is not directly deceiving nor
> outright lying.
I contend that the wording is used expressly for the purpose of deceiving
Eclipse user base into thinking that Che is the
Great words Max. Whole heartedly agree.
I think the real issue started at EclipseCon where they presented themselves as
“the next generation Eclipse IDE”, not “a next generation Eclipse IDE", or as I
see now their web pages simply stating "Eclipse Che Next Generation Eclipse
IDE” which implies
On 06/30/2016 10:27 AM, Eike Stepper wrote:
Hi All,
I have not a very strong opinion on this wording, but it strikes me that their wording is
unnecessarily biasing. "Next-generation"
does imply that it's a newer and better variant of something that's older and
less good.
IMHO, "next
Hi All,
I have not a very strong opinion on this wording, but it strikes me that their wording is unnecessarily biasing.
"Next-generation" does imply that it's a newer and better variant of something that's older and less good. I would
appreciate if they just tried to avoid this connotation
Hi Konstantin,
Below is my opinon as an Eclipse community member (not speaking on behalf
of the foundation nor my employer)
I recognize the wording CodeEnvy or rather the Eclipse Che project is bold
and for some maybe even directly threatining - but I do not believe the
foundation as such should
