being a build after the "officially declared" (but apparently not final) orbit build. Please let me know when the final "final" build for Oxygen.3 is ready. (Will the platform be spinning an RC4a to pick that up?)
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP PMC lead
- Original
Wayne,
The Web Tools Platform (WTP) will participate in Photon with an
offset of +2. WTP's release record can be found at
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/webtools/releases/3.10.0
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP PMC lead
From: Wayne Beaton
To: Cross project issues
Date:
is not
visible using WTP alone- this is a method provided for adopters, and was
thus not caught during WTP testing.) If anyone has an issue with this,
please let us know.
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP PMC lead
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross
the Simultaneous Release Repository itself will
get the correct WTP bits. Also, it is not a full replacement of WTP, so
most of the newer plugins are present in the EPPs (which made figuring this
issue out rather interesting.)
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP Releng project lead
uot; state for
Oxygen?
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP Releng project lead
From: "Wenz, Michael"
To: Cross project issues
Date: 07/18/2016 11:25 AM
Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Graphiti participating in Oxygen
Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclips
g our RC4
contribution tonight (on our +2 day).
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP Releng project lead
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
that a security hole can
be exploited.
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP Releng project lead
From: Rob Stryker
To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Date: 11/16/2015 05:17 PM
Subject:[cross-project-issues-dev] Question on commons-collections
dependencies
Sent by:
Bob,
Those bundles are part of WTP. Assuming that this is for Neon, our
M3 contribution is
http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R3.8.0/S-3.8.0M3-2015010029
/repository . And those bundles have not moved from WTP- they have been
there since WTP began.
FWIW,
- Carl
David,
Yes, that is Eclipselink's unsigned version of javax.persistence that
WTP still ships- we have had issues consuming the signed version (but we
are still working on this issue).
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP Build guy
From: David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
To:
at is still three months after
the GA of Java 8, but your recollection of the timeline was a little off.)
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP Build guy
From: "Max Rydahl Andersen"
To: "Cross project issues"
Cc: eclipse-...@eclipse.org
Date: 05/13/2015 06:27 AM
Subject:
n WTP on
Eclipse Kepler. I would assume that the same would be true for Java 9 and
Eclipse Mars.
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP Build guy
From: "Max Rydahl Andersen"
To: eclipse-...@eclipse.org
Cc: Cross project issues
Date: 05/12/2015 02:27 PM
Subject:Re: [cross-pro
Wayne,
If you already opened a bug for the javax.persistence, can you
duplicate it against https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=460094 ?
If you did not open a bug, that's fine- we already have one.
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP Build guy
From: Wayne Beaton
To:
remote.origin.pushurl to
ssh://@git.eclipse.org:29418/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build
(Right click on your org.eclipse.simrel.build git repository, select
properties, find remote.origin.pushurl and edit the value.)
Then it is back to using Git as normal.
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP Build guy
From: "Konst
Folks,
Likewise, the WTP 3.7 integration build is failing when it tries to
connect to its first Git repository. What happened?
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP Build guy
From: Thomas Hallgren
To: Cross project issues
Date: 04/09/2015 10:35 AM
Subject:[cross-project
Folks,
We were finally able to resolve the WTP build issues (thanks to help
from David Williams), and I have updated our contribution to the
simultaneous release. Please let me know if there are any issues.
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP Build guy
From: Carl Anderson/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
update our prereqs for M5. As such, WTP
still does not have an M5 build that we can contribute, so we will be late
in our contribution to Mars M5.
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP Build guy
From: Matthias Sohn
To: Cross project issues
Date: 02/03/2015 05:32 PM
Subject:Re: [cross
Folks,
And we backed stuff out. The other issue is fixed, but another issue
came up! We'll try to get our CBI build working properly for RC2.
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP Build guy
|>
Folks,
We just updated the WTP contribution. Our initial attempt failed due
to bug 442169, but after a respin that issue appears to be fixed.
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP Build guy
|>
| F
Folks,
Our RC1a candidate is now available, and has been added to the
Simultaneous Release aggregation.
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP Build guy
|>
| F
- and will update its
contribution to the Simultaneous Release.
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP Build guy
|--
Folks,
We fixed the build issue. WTP 3.6.0 RC1 was just added to the
Simultaneous Release.
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP Build guy
|>
| F
not ready yet.) Hopefully the webmasters at
eclipse.org will get this issue resolved quickly and WTP will contribute on
time, but since I am not 100% sure of that, I wanted to warn people of the
possible delay.
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP Build guy___
, a
quick sniff test will be done and it will be contributed to the simrel.
However, since the build just started (and takes around 5 hours), our
contribution will be late for RC3.
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP programmer___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing
Folks,
We are doing a rebuild for a fix for a regression in our Java EE 6
tooling - see bug https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=409872 for
details. As such, the WTP 3.5 RC3 contribution will be happening in about
5 hours.
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP Build
Matt,
Any chance we can get the contents
from
/shared/webtools/committers/wtp4x-R3.5.0-I/20130418031431/I-3.5.0-20130418031431/
copied from the old server? Or is it lost?
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP Build guy
|>
| F
Matt,
Yes, one concern- does the same server that provides /shared/common
also provide /shared/webtools ? I think we just lost the build we were
working towards declaring. (I didn't think it was an issue,
since /shared/webtools is not /shared/common.)
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP
Folks,
The issue was resolved early this morning. The WTP build has
finished, I have tested it, and I have contributed it to the aggregation.
It can be found at
http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R3.5.0/S-3.5.0M5-20130206143825/
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP Build guy
Folks,
We're having troubles producing a WTP 3.5.0 M5 build on top of the
Eclipse 4.3 M5 declare, due to issues with DTP. Please see
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=399904 for details. As such,
the WTP contribution to Kepler M5 will be late.
FWIW,
- Carl Anderso
set up
Eclipse-SourceReferences to CVS code- even the platform in all of its
Indigo releases, has CVS Eclipse-SourceReferences.)
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP programmer
|>
| F
Editor feature in WTP for
M4- it was pulled from M3 due to similar issues, but we want to re-include
it, if at all possible. (See
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=395192 )
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP programmer
|>
| F
an Eclipse Kepler M4 driver that contains the ICU changes, and we will
not have much time to react in case there is an issue.
If there are other teams that are blocked by WTP's lack of a build on
top of an Eclipse Kepler M4 driver that contains the ICU changes, please
let me know.
now we are
contributing (and declaring) our WTP RC2.
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP Build guy___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
discussion. But I
thought that I ought to bring them up so that other teams were aware of
them.
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP Build guy
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cro
33 matches
Mail list logo
