Hi
CDO is too important a project to not fix this, so I vote for the
(partial) respin.
Maybe next year we can have a bit more reviewing, approving and testing.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 13/06/2013 18:46, Pascal Rapicault wrote:
I'm not involved in the actual process that
eally
appropriate for RC4.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 12/06/2013 10:28, Sven Efftinge wrote:
Here you are :
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=410571
The respective hudson job is :
https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/Xtext-nightly
Hi
What's the fix, what's the Bugzilla, what's the commit?
Where's the build? dashboard shows no builds in the last 24 hours.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 12/06/2013 10:00, Sven Efftinge wrote:
Hi all,
I just wanted to inform you that we are building an RC4a toda
r the PMC are failing to complete the approval by
updating Bugzillas in response to the approval grant on the PMC mailing
list.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 05.06.2013 23:21, Wayne Beaton
wrote:
> Greetings folks.
>
> I've built a little Bugzilla query that
lists the projec
s?
Regards
Ed Willink
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
Hi
"Eclipse account" is ambiguous.
Committers accounts only would be undesirable.
Bugzilla accounts only seems a reasonable compromise.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 25/05/2013 12:20, Denis Roy wrote:
IP policy.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 17/05/2013 19:20, Wayne Beaton wrote:
I believe that the Contribution Questionnaire page in the wiki [1]
answers this. If it is unclear, either take a crack at clarifying
it yourself
evolving libraries?
Regards
Ed Willink
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
gards
Ed Willink
On 17/05/2013 07:18, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi
What has happened to the old (very good) IP tool?
It gave me a good auto-generated log for MDT/OCL that I could
easily review.
http://eclipse.org/projects/
and approved.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 26/04/2013 19:24, The Eclipse Foundation wrote:
Kepler approaches.
I'm starting to get IP Log review requests for the upcoming
release. In at least two cases, I'm pretty
e and also allow restrictive requirements to be satisfied
without disruption from elsewhere.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 08/05/2013 09:11, Stephan Leicht Vogt wrote:
Hi
As I was the one introducing google guava 12 to orb
decision, rather than a de facto accident imposed by a library,
which IMHO should be built with 1.5 compatibility.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 07/05/2013 22:35, David M Williams wrote:
> Since the bulk
bulk of Eclipse is still Java
5 compliant, this seems like a killer.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 07/05/2013 20:11, David M Williams wrote:
Can you explain more?
I don't recall any
previous problems (which, I know, says more about my m
Hi
My recollection is that there was a com.google.guava version problem at M6.
It seems to have got worse for M7.
I find that I have version 10, 11 and 12 and no doubt the bad class
version trouble is a consequence.
How are we going to solve this?
Regards
Ed Willink
Hi
Is M7 available for the platform?
The downloads page suggests that it is and that it was built on
Thursday, so it should now be accessible, but I get a variety of bad
file and server retries from a selection of alternate OS'.
Regards
Ed Wi
declaration should be revised.
The bugs have been fixed, so make sure you use the latest EMF nightly
build for M6 warm-ups.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 14/03/2013 07:45, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi David
Is there anything more that you can share with us?
Currently my three projects OCL, QVTd and
t impression to users and not what
was endorsed by the Release Review. CM at least demonstrates that I
have done this.
Perhaps the RR submissions should be tagged, and only EMO/PMC are
able to move tags thereafter.
Regards
ink.
Please add that link.
Regards
Ed Willink
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
?
How is the choice enforced?
If there are two separate copies which is seen by the user?
If I choose XML, how is the PMI refreshed?
Regards
Ed Willink
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https
hich of
the old/new way is in use?
What happens if I edit in the PMI, then my colleague edits the XML?
Are you automatically updating the XML and performing GIT commits on
my behalf?
Regards
Ed Willink
__
ertainly a much lower priority.
- if there is a central 'market-place' of companion files, then that
is all that needs searching.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 15/03/2013 07:46, Matthias Sohn
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:19
hange on 8-Mar and retracted it on 9-Mar?
Regards
Ed Willink
On 14/03/2013 07:45, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi David
Is there anything more that you can share with us?
Currently my three projects OCL, QVTd and QVTo are all showing
unexpected test failures. These are not the usual
uite a few recent completions with
amber status. Is anyone else seeing these issues?
[Hudson UI, particularly the Configure-Save response is incredibly slow
at the moment, indeed Save frequently doesn't refresh at all, but
Back-Configure confirms whether the change has occurred.]
Rega
Hi
Fine for me.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 01/03/2013 15:06, Adolfo Sanchez-Barbudo Herrera wrote:
Hi all,
I'm wondering if somebody else is experiencing bugzilla
unresponsiveness... It's not usual.
Cheers,
Adolfo.
___
cro
If the world demands Maven, everyone who isn't fully on board for
Maven starts to look like a dinosaur.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 27/02/2013 15:06, Thomas Hallgren
wrote:
The team behind Buckminster has every
Hi
Is this a strong indication that Buckminster is doomed as in
in-house technology, and that all projects that migrated to
Buckminster should start to plan for a migration to Tycho?
Regards
Ed Willink
On 25/02/2013 06:54, David M
releases, with some aggrcon tooling that
diagnoses
maintenance version consistency? Seems like this could have avoided
both the EGIT and GEF problems.]
Regards
Ed Willink
On 22/02/2013 23:41, Konstantin
Komissarchik wrote
Hi
In my experience anything peculiar in the first 50 lines of Console
log is almost certainly just Hudson requesting a restart.
We now have many slaves so just reconfigure for another.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 06/02/2013 05
Hi
Should M5a be on the download page now?
Regards
Ed Willink
On 04/02/2013 16:23, John Arthorne wrote:
The Eclipse platform
is planning a rebuild
of M5 to address a major key binding regression that was
gs/show_bug.cgi?id=390792).
Regards
Ed Willink
On 19/01/2013 06:54, Ed Merks wrote:
David,
I'm not sure it's good advice to suggest autocrlf=false. The
problem is, if the wrong endings are
Hi
This is standard GIT protection for edited files.
As the message says you must either preserve of lose the changed files.
To lose it/them just replace all files shown in the Staging View by
HEAD. Then you're good to go.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 18/01/2013 21:45, Benjamin
gards
Ed Willink
On 15/01/2013 18:57, Wayne Beaton wrote:
That was 2006. I was young and foolish.
The post has multiple flaws. For one, hooking up to that
repository will bring in a whole host of crap that you don't want.
This is
Hi
Picking on no one in particular from a "Eclipse Corner CVS" search.
http://waynebeaton.wordpress.com/2006/04/11/updating-eclipse-corner-articles/
"Eclipse Corner GIT" gives very little.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 15/01/2013 16:58, Konstantin Komissarchik w
Ed Willink
On 15/01/2013 16:37, Shawn Pearce wrote:
Maybe the product documentation shouldn't be pointing to committer resources?
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi
But how could authors of Helios documentation change their documentation to
use GIT?!!
Re
Hi
But how could authors of Helios documentation change their documentation
to use GIT?!!
Regards
Ed Willink
On 15/01/2013 16:26, Campo, Christian wrote:
Hi Ed,
I totally understand your point and frustration.
However havnt we all been warned by Wayne in numerous emails that
absolutely no benefit in retracting this useful facility and
breaking functionality upon which
the current Juno release documentation depends.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 15/01/2013 15:14, Doug Schaefer wrote:
While Denis is pealing himself off the ceiling, I'll chime in. Isn't this
Hi
/cvsroot/modeling etc etc
Regards
Ed Willink
On 15/01/2013 14:58, Denis Roy wrote:
What other repositories? The only CVS repo I know of is Orbit.
Denis
On 01/15/2013 03:36 AM, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi Denis
Thanks. CVS from PSFs works again.
If we now have an anonymous
Hi Denis
Thanks. CVS from PSFs works again.
If we now have an anonymous CVS server for Orbit, can we please restore
the anonymous CVS access for the other repositories too so that Helios,
Indigo, Juno facilities work again for ordinary users?
Regards
Ed Willink
On 14/01/2013
.java,lpg.runtime.java,v2_0_17"/>
Regards
Ed Willink
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
this for projects on which I'm not a committer; it comes
as something of a surprise to me that there are non-Hudson builds. I
know that a couple of my users occasionally use Hudson builds, and on
occasion for faster interaction Xtext builds have been taken from Hudson.
Regards
latform
access find the plugins for you.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 29/12/2012 13:44, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi
It seems we are not allowed to use even anonymous CVS access any more;
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=397237
This breaks any build that continues to use CVS to l
longer
being maintained, and switching your build to using the project's Git
repo is better.
To locate the new Git repo , I would navigate to that project's
website. I would expect to see information on the source repositories
there.
Denis
On 12/29/2012 08:44 AM, Ed Willink
break too.
Then I tried browsing /gitroot; not obvious.
Then I tried searching wiki; no useful matches for org.eclipse.test and GIT.
So, how does one locate the GIT repo, P2 repo, for a given org.eclipse
plugin?
Regards
Ed Willink
___
Hi
Hudson seems to have gone AWOL again. I'm getting bad gateway.
Regards
Ed Willink
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
get an edit-time warning?
Regards
Ed Willink
On 19/12/2012 08:33, Laurent Goubet wrote:
Hi,
The 4 missing about.html files for EMF Compare were due to the
"usual" mistake of forgetting the cor
code so the
I-build contributed on Monday is sound.
[1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=396842
Regards
Ed Willink
On 18/12/2012 01:05, Adolfo Sanchez Barbudo wrote:
Hi All,
My apologies, but I'm a
Hi
QVTo M4 was built and contributed an hour ago. The simrel run looks
good; 10 minutes to go.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 18/12/2012 07:47, Mickael Istria wrote:
On 12/17/2012 11:20 PM, David M
Williams wrote
Hi
Isn't Hudson fun?
You didn't actually rerun, since I take the view that a fail on
Hudson is only a fail if it fails twice.
That said, this doesn't look like a Hudson problem.
My suspicion is that it's repo related, so it would be good to save
Hi
I'm surprised you didn't fall over QVTo that also has 4.0.0 to
5.0.0. This should be fixed for M4.
OCL also has 4.0.0 to 5.0.0 but it's optional. Should be fixed for
M4.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 27/11/2
HI David
Everything seems really slow here too.
Regards
Ed
On 02.10.2012 15:09, David M Williams wrote:
> I've switched to "1
|| 4" ... guess fastlane needs to be restarted. (And, I've seen Hudson's
web UI get slower and slower last few days ... not sure if its
subjective ... or if som
eel strongly that we must revert to 3.x as the promoted environment
until 4.x can reduce it's measured degradations to perhaps 10%.
Regards
Ed Willink
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
h
e can going forward.
Is it too late to switch to 3.8.1 rather than 4.2.1 for Juno SR1 packages?
Regards
Ed Willink
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-pr
dependencies to org.eclipse.pde.junit.runtime and
org.eclipse.jdt.junit4.runtime from some undistributed plugin such
as a tests plugin.
Regards
Ed Willink
Original Message
Subject
corrected; I had one one
two line test empty.ecore file that refused to convert. Xtext
editable files seem to lose their final line terminator. *.launch
files seem to use a bad editor that cannot convert.
Regards
egards
Ed Willink
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
Hi
The aggregator is now failing because Hudson slave1 is sick.
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=387524
Regards
Ed Willink
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https
.b3aggrcon
Regards
Ed Willink
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
maintain it properly?
I've done so once, in work-in-progress incubation code linked to
another incubation project whose APIs were very unstable.
Regards
Ed Willink
___
cross-project-issues-dev m
rtain so I prefer not to change it for
non-cosmetic effects since the Eclipse defaults are the only setting
that another workspace is likely to share.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 16/08/2012 16:30, John Arthorne
wrote:
For what it&#x
y CVS.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 16/08/2012 11:40, Ed Merks wrote:
Ed,
I doubt this conclusion is correct. You can tell git which files
(extensions) are binary via .gitattributes
https://help.github.com/articles/dealing-with
ally remove all CR-LFs that have leaked in somehow.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 16/08/2012 10:44, Eike Stepper wrote:
Am 16.08.2012 11:25, schrieb Ed Willink:
Hi Eike
Hi
My suspicion is that the problem is in the comparison tooling.
The files in the repo seem to be normalized to LF li
hem.
There is a comparison. EGIT must do a file compare to determine whether
the file is changed. If you edit a file and edit it back again, the file
disappears from the staging view, so EGIT must be using content rather
than timestamp to detect changes.
Regards
Regards
Ed Willink
On 16/08/2012 09:17, Ed Merks wrote:
David,
Comments below.
On 16/08/2012 9:53 AM, David M
Williams wrote:
Eike (and Ed)
I'm the last person to be
ines, so I suspect
that one may be 'rogue' through trying to debug this issue when a file
had been through a Linux machine.
I'd love to see a fix for this. CVS seemed less of a problem.
Regards
Ed Willink
___
cross-projec
epler should
be 3.2 to avoid more confusion.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 04/07/2012 06:17, zhu kane wrote:
Hello community,
I hesitated about raising such question in here. But I can't get
any response from PDT project even if filing cr
Hi
To be quite honest, when I tried to open with Winzip and failed, I felt
that I had tried and so moved on. I'm too busy.
This is a problem of many readers and one writer. It would help iof the
write rewrote to many the reading task easy for everyone.
Regards
Ed Willin
Hi
Keep on eye on the Progress View.
My impression is that there are a variety of add-ons interacting
badly through the builder, with EGIT re-indexing being just one of
many activities taking a long time to stabilize.
Regards
Ed
Hi
slave1 seems ok but fastlane has gone uncommunicative
(https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/buckminster-mdt-ocl-branch-tests/194/)
Regards
Ed Willink
On 13/06/2012 02:46, Denis Roy wrote:
I have restarted the slave agent on slave1. Let me know if this does not solve
the
sit the SLA?
Regards
Ed Willink
On 11/06/2012 21:53, Denis Roy wrote:
As we approach Juno, I'd like to quickly remind you:
Strategic and Entreprise Members [1] of the Eclipse Foundation can
nominate one or two contact people within their organization who are
authorized to contact W
Hi Eike
I use /help/topic/plugin-name...
Regards
Ed Willink
On 10/06/2012 17:45, Eike Stepper wrote:
Hi,
Our Java code uses many Platform interfaces and classes and when we
would like to have hrefs to the Platform Javadocs in our generated
Javadocs. The Ant script
Hi
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=382192 raised.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 10/06/2012 09:40, Eike Stepper wrote:
Hi,
It seems that Hudson needs some treatment.
Cheers
/Eike
http://www.esc-net.de
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper
Ed Willink
On 08/06/2012 11:09, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi Michael
I think that you're mistaken. QVTo didn't do an RC2; just RC1 and
RC3; both of which are visible on http://www.eclipse.org/mmt/downloads/index.php?project=qvto.
The
.
I'll keep looking.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 08/06/2012 10:11, Michael Golubev wrote:
Ed,
Try http://download.eclipse.org/mmt/qvto/updates/milestones.
The update site at ../mmt/* contains the 3.0.0 (3.0.0RC4
Hi Eike
M2M was renamed to MMT about a month ago.
http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/m2m/qvtoml/updates/milestones is stale.
Try http://download.eclipse.org/mmt/qvto/updates/milestones.
Apologies for the trouble caused by Machine-to-Machine usurping our name.
Regards
Ed
Hi
Surely a release consists of on-train projects + Orbit, so if they're
not on-train they should frozen be in Orbit.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 06/06/2012 17:13, Gunnar Wagenknecht wrote:
Hi,
Just to shed some lights into the issue. Gyrex requires Gemini JPA for
its Eclips
x27;m doing. It's clear from newsgroups
that users have trouble too. It's just not user friendly.
Regards
Ed Willink
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman
Ed Willink
On 25/05/2012 22:39, David M Williams wrote:
3.
I'm not sure where documented
either, but the general advice, I've heard, and agree with, is
for _products_ to include update sites but not features. So,
E
e-M7 value. This is significant for users attempting to access the
OCL Standard Library as a model file rather than through its Java API.
Regards
Ed Willink
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse
.
Regards
Ed Willink
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
sometimes prevented tests running in 512M. After
making sure that all fields were nulled in tearDown() they run in 32M.
GMF Tooling uses MDT/OCL, so they may be encountering a similar form of
model lock-in.
Regards
Ed Willink
___
cross-proj
Hi
slave1 seems to have been restarted about 30 minutes ago; seems ok to me
now.
Ed
On 15/02/2012 20:09, Jeff Johnston wrote:
Is anyone able to get an executor? I have been trying for a while to
start a Linux Tools build to fix a feature rename issue from SR1 to SR2.
-- Jeff J.
On 02
Hi
The story is clear. Does that mean com.google.collect should be removed
from Orbit, or just carefully excluded from Orbit for Simultaneous
Release builds?
Regards
Ed Willink
On 13/02/2012 14:55, Brian de Alwis wrote:
On 13-Feb-2012, at 7:57 AM, Paul Webster wrote:
Did
the problem in an JUnit test run as a plugin test. The same
JUnit test run as an ordinary test has no problem, so perhaps there
is a relative loading order of com.google.guava and
com.google.collect that can be enforced to avoid the problem.
Regards
Ed Will
Hi Miles
I suspect that the 'longest' job is often a job that is waiting for
deadlocked broken daemons to magically unlock/time-out.
I know that on a couple of occasions MDT/OCL was one of the blockers
even though I had explicitly killed the problem jobs.
Regards
Ed
On 0
Hi Martin
On 20/01/2012 09:52, Ed Willink wrote:
- A feature may remain unchanged between 2 train releases, eg Eclipse
Platform CVS .. makes no sense renaming just for the sake of the name
So don't rename it. The new name will be missing and the previous
available name is a best guess.
l banner. If we used train naming, just looking at the
Installed Feature List would reveal all.
Regards
Ed Willink
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross
xed something or the problem just went away.
Regards
Ed Willink
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
Hi
As per Bug 339027, please restart Hudson.
Regards
Ed Willink
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
gards
Ed Willink
On 19/12/2011 08:05, Philipp W. Kutter | Montages AG wrote:
Ed, Miles:
First a simple +1 on what Miles wrote.
It is exactly what I think, he expressed exactly the main
problems.
Miles: the message is not a
't see the system improving much unless Eclipse employs its
committers and companies make significant contributions to pay the
corresponding salaries.]
Regards
Ed Willink
On 17/12/2011 12:55, Philipp W. Kutter | Montages AG wrote:
Perfect!
I wish you all Happy Holidays!
It is
ll be available in Juno supported
by the existing QVTo team.
The only process exception that may be needed is tolerance of a one or
two day tardiness in setting the contribution flag.
I'm sure we all wish to thank Nicolas for being so helpful to Eclipse.
Thank you Nicolas.
Regards
Hi John, Sven
Thanks. It appears the double package provider is not a major concern,
so I've done my job by raising the possible issue.
OCL was easily fixed by changing the require bundle from
com.google.collect to com.google.guava.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 16/12/2011
at hasn't been fully rebuilt to install correctly but
fail at run time.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 16/12/2011 05:57, John Arthorne wrote:
Ed Willink wrote on 12/16/2011
08:39:27 AM:
> Does no-one have a view
Hi
Does no-one have a view on whether provision of the
com.google.common.collect package by two distinct Orbit bundles is
acceptable?
Regards
Ed Willink
On 15/12/2011 06:25, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi
In Indigo, the com.google.common.collect package was (and still is)
provided by
opriate to at least warn the community of this
hazard, and ask whether this is a serious breach of versioning principles.
Regards
Ed Willink
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.o
d just searching the downloads/modeling tree helpful
in discovering quite what spellings and policies projects are actually
using.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 06/12/2011 10:21, Eike Stepper wrote:
Hi Ed,
Now our maintenance build fails because
http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/mdt/oc
how users find it easy to get in a mess. Does P2 satisfy some unwise
lowerbounds and then get confused by the conflicts?
Surely you must publish distinct (albeit binary identical) multi-version
releases in order to publish the correct dependencies to P2.
Regards
Ed Willink
On
direction?
What is necessary to enthuse, presumably P2, to support it?
Regards
Ed Willink
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
unoM4
which would be unambiguous and provide the critical missing indirection
from external reference and internal detail. The current scheme just
guarantees major ripple pain as the internal details change.]
Regards
Ed Willink
On 03/12/2011 08:25, Eike Stepper wrote:
Hi,
Our build
401 - 499 of 499 matches
Mail list logo
