version. This should ensure that code still works (compiles
and passes tests) against updated dependencies.
I don't think this should be much of a burden on "maintainers".
Stephan
On 16.12.2017 17:43, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:
> Dani,
>
>
> DTD did participate in Oxyg
e the class was already deleted,
so, DTP should have run into this in June already.
Note that we announced the deletion on this mailing list.
Dani
From: Konstantin Komissarchik
To:Cross project issues
Date:15.12.2017 17:46
Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Ca
Sapphire will participate in Photon with +3 offset. For now, the contributed
release will remain 9.1 (same as Oxygen).
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password
DTP
> functionality
Do you have a bug report for that? The platform usually doesn't break APIs. Did
DTP maybe use internals?
Dani
From: Konstantin Komissarchik
To: "cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org"
Date: 14.12.2017 22:11
Subject: [cross-project-iss
,
- Konstantin
From: Wayne Beaton
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 1:16 PM
To: Cross project issues
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Can DTP join EGit in Oxygen.2 respin?
Will do.
Wayne
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik
wrote:
Could someone forward this to the
Could someone forward this to the Planning Council, please?
I am currently working with Nick Boldt to transition DTP releng responsibility.
In the meantime, the version of DTP in Oxygen.2 has compatibility issues. It
was last build with Oxygen.0.M4 and platform made an API change after that
whi
Generation Platform for Analytics
IBM Silicon Valley Laboratory
Konstantin Komissarchik ---12/07/2017 04:24:11 PM---DTP 1.14.1 build with the
fix for the previously described issue is now available. https://urldefens
From: Konstantin Komissarchik
To: Cross project issues
Date: 12/07/2017 04:24
After more than ten years of participation in the Eclipse Ecosystem, I am
moving on to other pursuits. I will be leaving Oracle at the end of this year.
My new employer (a startup called Prifender) is not involved in any way with
Eclipse or tooling. Obviously, I will need to scale down my Eclips
DTP 1.14.1 build with the fix for the previously described issue is now
available.
https://www.eclipse.org/datatools/downloads.php
Thanks,
- Konstantin
From: Konstantin Komissarchik
Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2017 2:20 PM
To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Subject: [cross-project
Currently, DTP contributes version 1.14 to the aggregation, which actually has
compile time errors against the Oxygen platform. The contributed build was
produced for Oxygen M4. It appears that some time after that, a breaking change
was made in the platform, but the major version of the bundle
Thanks. I followed the discussion trail that tracks fixing the Orbit bundle to
the following bug:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=511333
> 1. Where did version 4.5.2 in root Eclipse project repo come from, as it’s
> not in Orbit M5 build?
I answered this question myself. This ver
Yes, by root I mean platform, JDK, etc.
> But I can comment for the Eclipse top-level project (a.k.a. as SDK and
> Platform): we never shipped 'org.apache.http.entity.mime'.
That’s false. The eclipse top-level project repository for 4.6.2 includes
version 4.3.6 of the org.apache.httpcomponents.
An alternative that would not degrade startup performance is to ship one res
bmp along with vector files. When an image is referenced initially, use the
shipped bmp and start a background render job from the vector file. Once render
completes, cache the result to disk and swap in the correct res
Sapphire project will participate in Oxygen with +3 offset. The initial version
contributed will be the 9.1 release that is slated for release in September.
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.sapphire/releases/9.1
Thanks,
- Konstantin
___
As I understand it, the end goal is to find projects that are no longer
actively participating, but not actively participating is only bad when there
is a breakage that requires that project to react. These breakages are
relatively rare. So, to guard against a rare occurrence of a breakage that
> I do not believe the foundation as such should restrict a specific projects
> ability to market it self as long as it is not directly deceiving nor
> outright lying.
I contend that the wording is used expressly for the purpose of deceiving
Eclipse user base into thinking that Che is the future
> I guess one question, is that really the Foundation’s role?
Yes, it is. We entrust the foundation to safeguard various Eclipse trademarks
and this looks like a clear case of misuse.
> Is it not up to us, the community, to make sure the messaging is clear?
Even if others put out clarifying and
I was just reading the latest Microsoft/RedHat/Codenvy press release and came
across the problematic wording that we’ve seen before.
Microsoft Visual Studio Code and Eclipse Che, the next-generation Eclipse IDE,
have added support for the protocol.
https://www.redhat.com/en/about/press-releases
The original plan was to release Sapphire 10 for Neon, but work on v10 was not
completed due to other priorities. As a consequence, we are falling back to the
latest service release (9.0.5) for Neon.
As far as I know, there are no consumers of Sapphire on the train, so no one on
the train woul
Would it be possible to convert reports to e-mail alerts sent to project’s
mailing list? I suspect we’d get better compliance that way.
Thanks,
- Konstantin
From: David M Williams
Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 5:42 PM
To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev]
Yes, if another project references the hidden all-in-one feature, it will be
slurped up by aggregation and we are back to square one. If you aren’t able to
remove this feature from your project’s repository completely as a post-build
step (the ideal solution), I would recommend naming it in a wa
contribution ZIP/category that replicates the features contributed to
SimRel.
- An All-in-One ZIP/category that additionally bundles Orbit facilities
avoiding the need for users to learn how to include Orbit in the available
sites.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 05/02/2016 17:33, Konstanti
ds
Ed Willink
On 05/02/2016 17:33, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:
I would advise strongly against using the feature includes directive for Orbit
bundles. While doing so provides a cheap way to mirror the Orbit bundle into
the produced project repository, it also locks you down to using that
I would advise strongly against using the feature includes directive for Orbit
bundles. While doing so provides a cheap way to mirror the Orbit bundle into
the produced project repository, it also locks you down to using that one
version of the bundle and we end up with multiple versions of vari
, Mickael Istria wrote:
On 01/07/2016 06:08 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:
-1 to forcing the use of refs/for/x
The validation results are unreliable as the aggregation build is not safely
reproducible. A failed validation result is just as likely to be due to someone
changing their already
-1 to forcing the use of refs/for/x
The validation results are unreliable as the aggregation build is not safely
reproducible. A failed validation result is just as likely to be due to someone
changing their already-contributed repository.
Thanks,
- Konstantin
From: Mickael Istria
Sent: Th
> I would imagine by the time Neon is released in June and used to build RAP
> applications most all the major app servers should support Java 8.
Indeed. Java 8 is already supported by GlassFish (since version 4) and WebLogic
Server (since version 12.1.3).
Thanks,
- Konstantin
From: Thomas W
27;ve taken a look and the underlying host has no issues resolving names,
but it's postfix instance seems 'stuck' and unable to resolve the mail
relay. I've restarted postfix and it's now sending mail.
-Matt.
On 11/20/2015 02:50 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:
> See S
See Sapphire HIPP. The failure is seen consistently.
Konstantin Komissarchik
Senior Development Manager
Eclipse Tools Group
Oracle
> On Nov 20, 2015, at 11:26, Matthew Ward(Bt. Kt. SSA.)
> wrote:
>
> I'm tracking a transient issue with DNS resolution, but it's proving
&
Is there a known outage at eclipse.org where HIPP instances cannot reach the
download server and both HIPP and Bugzilla fail while sending mail? Note that
the download server appears accessible externally.
Konstantin Komissarchik
Senior Development Manager
Eclipse Tools Group
Oracle
How do you create your target platform?
- Konstantin
From: Bob Brodt
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 12:40 PM
To: issues, Cross
Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] Where's WST?
Hi all,
I'm having trouble building BPMN2 Modeler because of missing dependencies:
[ERROR] Cannot resolve project dep
that makes it trip on
the error documented in Bug 478427.
I have opened a PDE bug.
Bug 481792
Two workarounds are available for those affected. Details in the two referenced
bugs. Hopefully, this can be fixed for M4.
Thanks,
- Konstantin
From: Konstantin Komissarchik
Sent: Thursday
this requires etc. is currently out of scope.
But the Foundation is open to extensions to the error reporting client which
allow users to share errors with arbitrary (e.g., your own or other
centralized) data end-points.
Marcel
Am 03.08.2015 um 17:49 schrieb Konstantin Komissarchik
:
I have
o be
more specific if you send out a note to this list that there is a blocking
regression.
Dani
From: Konstantin Komissarchik
To: Cross project issues
Date: 05.11.2015 21:06
Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] Blocking regression in Neon M3 JDT
Sent by: cro
this message. The bug is marked as 'normal' and nothing is
indicating that this is blocking something or someone. You should try to be
more specific if you send out a note to this list that there is a blocking
regression.
Dani
From: Konstantin Komissarchik
To: Cro
See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=478427
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.or
eon.
I hope Konstantin does not get discouraged by this email storm and
leaves DTP so that is returns to be a dead project.
Best regards, Lars
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov
wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Konstantin Komissarchik"
>>
manifests, contributing to the project, removing
the dependency, forking, etc).
John
- Original message -----
From: Konstantin Komissarchik
Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
To: Ed Willink , "cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org"
Cc:
Subject: Re: [cross-project-is
major version bump for Neon
On 28/10/2015 13:13, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:
I have no specific plans re ODA’s Java API.
So absolutely no justification for a change then. There is no need for all
plugins to bump together. It is cosmetically nice to see all plugins with the
same
not function well. Eventually our burden would be lightened by the
non-existence of our community.
Regards,
Ed
On 28/10/2015 2:39 AM, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:
Let’s set aside the question of whether or not a BREE bump requires a major
version bump.
Simultaneous release process al
y a couple of the features (the most cumulative
ones) are the only ones actually used by other products.
A move to version 2.0 would imply that DTP has significant breaking API changes
(and imply major new function) which would not be correct.
Regards,
Brian
Brian Payton
DTP PMC Lead
Developer Tool
would imply that DTP has significant breaking API changes
(and imply major new function) which would not be correct.
Regards,
Brian
Brian Payton
DTP PMC Lead
Developer Tooling for Data Services
IBM Silicon Valley Laboratory
From: Konstantin Komissarchik
To: Ed Merks ,
"
send a note to dtp-dev mailing list.
Thanks,
- Konstantin
From: Ed Merks
Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2015 8:31 AM
To: Konstantin Komissarchik;cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] DTP major version bump for Neon
Konstantin,
Comments below.
On 24/10
major version? Many projects
update their BREE without updating their major version.
Greetings,
Kaloyan
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik
wrote:
DTP will soon contribute v2 to Neon aggregation stream. The current version is
1.12.1. The reason for the major version bump is the
From: Konstantin Komissarchik
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2015 1:02 PM
To: Cross project issues
Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] DTP major version bump for Neon
DTP will soon contribute v2 to Neon aggregation stream. The current version is
1.12.1. The reason for the major version bump is the
DTP will soon contribute v2 to Neon aggregation stream. The current version is
1.12.1. The reason for the major version bump is the move to requiring Java 8.
All DTP plugins and features will get a major version bump.
I recommend all consuming projects to prepare for this ahead of time by
rel
A public service notice since many projects are moving to Java 8 for Neon… If
you build and condition/pack with Java 8, it’s important that you sign using
Java 8, otherwise you could run into some really bizarre issues with your
.pack.gz files failing verification after unpacking. By default, th
Offset: +3
Version: https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.sapphire/releases/10
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
this lis
ssh.
Dani
From: Konstantin Komissarchik
To: "cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org"
Date: 29.09.2015 21:26
Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] Git outage?
Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
I am getting a failure when pus
I am getting a failure when pushing or pulling from Git this morning. Is anyone
else seeing this?
org.eclipse.jgit.api.errors.TransportException:
ssh://kkomissarc...@git.eclipse.org/gitroot/sapphire/org.eclipse.sapphire.git:
Session.connect: java.io.IOException: End of IO Stream Read
Brian,
Is there a bug tracking the work-in-progress to transition DTP to the common
build infrastructure and building on eclipse.org systems?
- Konstantin
From: Brian Payton
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 10:31 AM
To: Cross project issues
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] DTP for Neo
The maintenance issue is a tricky one with no right answer for all consumers.
Some want new features, some want bug fixes for this year’s release, some want
bug fixes for last year’s release, some want bug fixes for the release three
year’s ago, etc.
Ideally, out aggregation processes and infr
Thanks, John, for reminding me of this aspect. We will definitely need to
address this aspect as well, otherwise only non-epp package users will receive
the update benefits.
- Konstantin
From: John Arthorne
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 12:33 PM
To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
There was a discussion regarding this on the last architecture council call and
I put forward a proposal on the mailing list to address at least some aspects
of the update story. I plan to bring it up again at the next meeting. Once a
proposal is more fleshed out, we will bring it to the plannin
Has anyone reached out to DTP team yet regarding Neon M2 compatibility? I
haven’t seen anything on cross-project and dtp-dev list is silent as well. DTP
last released with Luna (version 1.12) and that’s what’s currently contributed
to Neon aggregation, but it’s not compatible with the M2 build
Has anyone reached out to DTP team yet regarding Neon M2 compatibility? I haven’t seen anything on cross-project and dtp-dev list is silent as well. DTP last released with Luna (version 1.12) and that’s what’s currently contributed to Neon aggregation, but it’s not compatible with the M2 build of
within the product?
Cheers,
Ian
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Konstantin Komissarchik
wrote:
I, for one, would like to have further discussion on the topic of platform
strictly following Semantic Versioning as it’s an important tool in ensuring
that we create valid installations tha
I, for one, would like to have further discussion on the topic of platform
strictly following Semantic Versioning as it’s an important tool in ensuring
that we create valid installations that don’t break with class not found or
method not found errors.
- Konstantin
From: cross-projec
For any piece of software to remain relevant in the long term, it needs to
evolve and that does mean making breaking changes. I don’t like the idea of the
community questioning the need for every change. It’s a fallacy to weigh the
cost to react against the cost to maintain as the cost to react
-issues-dev] Error reporter and third-party code
Sounds reasonable to me. Please file a bug report in EPP / Logging. You’ll get
the notice when a new quick action is available.
Am 31.07.2015 um 22:01 schrieb Konstantin Komissarchik
:
While we ponder broader process and
...@eclipse.org
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Marcel Bruch
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2015 2:49 AM
To: Cross project issues
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Error reporter and third-party code
Am 31.07.2015 um 22:01 schrieb Konstantin Komissarchik
:
While
half Of Marcel Bruch
Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2015 2:55 PM
To: Cross project issues
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Error reporter and third-party code
> Am 25.07.2015 um 15:32 schrieb Konstantin Komissarchik
> :
>
> > is opening and extending automated error reporting to
&
s-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Gunnar
Wagenknecht
Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2015 7:33 AM
To: Cross project issues
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Error reporter and third-party code
> Am 25.07.2015 um 06:32 schrieb Ko
-1
We have no reliable means at assigning blame. Only guesses that are likely
wrong as many times as they are right. Presenting unreliable blame information
to the end user will cause many problems.
Konstantin Komissarchik
Senior Development Manager
Eclipse Tools Group
Oracle
> On Jul
ings like a rights management, different
duplicate detection and project guessing mechanisms etc.
Konstantin,
is opening and extending automated error reporting to non-eclipse.org plugins,
e.g. to member companies, worth these efforts?
Marcel
Am 24.07.2015 um 20:09 schrieb
r them, it must be clear to the users that
these errors are caused by Liferay, Oracle, Findbugs or whatever third-party
plugin. Eclipse should not make the impression of being buggy if third party
plugins are behaving badly.
Marcel
Am 23.07.2015 um 19:23 schrieb Konstantin Komissarchik
> 'instance of Eclipse' is ambiguous.
I mean the Eclipse installation. The reason I think this scope is the correct
one is as that's where the plugins reside that the user is asked to make a
choice regarding. For instance, I might have one installation with pre-release
code that's private and a
Original Message-
From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Gunnar
Wagenknecht
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 9:29 AM
To: Cross project issues
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Error reporter and third-party cod
A big +1
-Original Message-
From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Max Rydahl
Andersen
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 5:12 AM
To: Cross project issues
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Error reporter and
> I assume that you and everyone else understands why classnames from
> non-eclipse/non-apache bundles are replaced by HIDDEN.HIDDEN by default.
I can imagine cases, such as pre-release products and internal solutions, where
stack frames contain sensitive information, but that isn’t the gener
I've been watching the error reports trickling into the Sapphire inbox, but
unfortunately none of them have been actionable so far. The issue is
interaction with third-party code. Consider the following stack trace:
java.lang.NullPointerException: HIDDEN
at
org.eclipse.jst.j2ee.model.ModelProv
Sapphire is in the "would like to contribute a new build, but not critical
to ask for a respin" category. RC4/Final includes a couple of minor fixes
and documentation polish.I was caught up with family responsibilities and
unable to contribute the build in time last night. It wouldn't be the end of
-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Stephan
Herrmann
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 3:23 PM
To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] When are Gerrit commits
automatically applied?
On 05/21/2015 12:11 AM, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:
> [...] but once that
Umm... As software guys, our raison d'etre is to rid the world of manual
steps wherever we see them. :)
If I squint just right, I can sort of see the reason that Hudson is a useful
contributor to the process here (see my prior objections), but once that
verification has been done, what's the value
Never mind that. Looks like caching issues. Thanks for fixing.
From: Konstantin Komissarchik [mailto:konstantin.komissarc...@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 11:10 AM
To: 'Cross project issues'
Subject: RE: [cross-project-issues-dev] Mars RC1 orbit build incomplete?
Tha
dex.html and will investigate if
all else is as it should be.
From: "Konstantin Komissarchik"
To:"'Cross project issues'" ,
Date:05/19/2015 01:11 PM
Subject:[cross-project-issues-dev] Mars RC1 orbit build incomplete?
S
The build that's listed for Mars RC1 on orbit downloads page doesn't have
the usual landing page with info and download links.
http://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/
http://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/drops/S20150513182540/
Thanks,
- Konstantin
_
, I always add the remote review url as described in [1], so I just
have to 'git push review' my changes.
[1] https://wiki.eclipse.org/Gerrit#Adding_a_dedicated_remote
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Mickael Istria wrote:
On 05/05/2015 10:26 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote
Behalf Of Mickael
Istria
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 1:29 PM
To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Unable to contribute to Mars... very
frustrated
On 05/05/2015 10:26 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:
So what should I have done if I wanted to exerci
: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 1:24 PM
To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Unable to contribute to Mars... very
frustrated
On 05/05/2015 10:21 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:
Thanks, Doug! The "save private key" button was the magic step that I w
: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Unable to contribute to Mars... very
frustrated
On 05/05/2015 09:48 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:
> Have you uploaded your SSH key to Gerrit ?
https://wiki.eclipse.org/Gerrit#SSH_Keys
It would require having such a key in the first place. I understa
1:00 PM
To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Unable to contribute to Mars... very
frustrated
On 05/05/2015 09:48 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:
> Have you uploaded your SSH key to Gerrit ?
https://wiki.eclipse.org/Gerrit#SSH_Keys
It woul
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Unable to contribute to Mars... very
frustrated
On 05/05/2015 03:50 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:
> Thanks, Carl. Regarding step 1, how do I generate and store the ssh
> key so that Eclipse will use it when communicating with Gerrit? I am on
Windows.
Th
n your org.eclipse.simrel.build git repository, select
properties, find remote.origin.pushurl and edit the value.)
Then it is back to using Git as normal.
FWIW,
- Carl Anderson
WTP Build guy
Inactive hide details for "Konstantin Komissarchik" ---05/05/2015 03:29:20
PM---For years, I'v
:37 PM
To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Unable to contribute to Mars... very
frustrated
On 05/05/2015 09:28 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:
For years, I've had a working setup that allowed me to update Sapphire's
simrel contribution. Wi
For years, I've had a working setup that allowed me to update Sapphire's
simrel contribution. With changes to use Gerrit, I am no longer able to
contribute. I've spent hours reading various wikis and I still cannot figure
out what keys I need to have and where I am supposed to shove them. Maybe
thi
For years, I've had a working setup that allowed me to update Sapphire's
simrel contribution. With changes to use Gerrit, I am no longer able to
contribute. I've spent hours reading various wikis and I still cannot figure
out what keys I need to have and where I am supposed to shove them. Maybe
thi
Also. The major version component on the affected platform bundles should be
incremented.
From: Konstantin Komissarchik [mailto:konstantin.komissarc...@oracle.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2015 9:31 AM
To: 'Cross project issues'
Subject: RE: Bug 456909 - Implementing Early Startu
they need to take
action while there is still plenty of time to plan for this. The final
removal should have also been announced on cross-project.
Thanks,
- Konstantin
From: Konstantin Komissarchik [mailto:konstantin.komissarc...@oracle.com]
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 2:58 PM
To: &
Could someone from the platform team comment on this issue?
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=456909
Plugins that have an IStartup extension and worked fine on 4.4 are causing
exceptions to be logged when used on 4.5 milestones. This appears to be an
API behavior regression. The
What version of Mylyn is included in Mars M6? I can't figure this out by
looking at the aggregation files since Mylyn is one of those projects that
points to a URL with varying content. I tried the latest build present at
that URL (3.15.0.v20150323-1913), but I consistently get the following error
I am a big supporter of more rigorous approach to simrel aggregation, but
what do we hope to gain from using Gerrit when the majority of projects
contribute a fixed URL that they vary the content of as need be?
- Konstantin
From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
[mailto:cross
-1
This service is used by automated build systems. It cannot be retired
without severe adverse consequence.
- Konstantin
-Original Message-
From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Denis Roy
Sent: Monday, Mar
What is the rationale for wanting to keep BREE levels as low as possible?
Even Java 7 enters the "no further public updates" phase in April of this
year. JRE 7 users in the normal update pipeline were upgraded to Java 8 in
January. Are there really users out there who _cannot_ run a newer version
o
It looks like Equinox Mars M4 build is missing various artifacts that should
be in the build, such as the equinox-SDK-MarsM4.zip file.
This is blocking some projects from being able to move to M4 and contribute
to M4.
http://download.eclipse.org/equinox/drops/S-MarsM4-201412102000/index.php
descriptive, like
Recommenders Error Reports
b) Improve the signature. In addition to "Your friendly error reports bot."
perhaps add a link with information and a link on how to remove the
functionality from a bugzilla project?
Thanks!
On 12/16/2014 01:39 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik
I am seeing some spurious Bugzilla edits recorded by the
error-reports-in...@eclipse.org account this morning. Could someone associated
with this account take a look?
Thanks,
- Konstantin
-Original Message-
From: bugzilla-dae...@eclipse.org [mailto:bugzilla-dae...@eclipse.org]
Sent:
We have something in Sapphire that would be applicable.
http://git.eclipse.org/c/sapphire/org.eclipse.sapphire.git/tree/plugins/org.eclipse.sapphire.ui/src/org/eclipse/sapphire/ui/DelayedTasksExecutor.java
In the text change listener, we schedule a task to update the model (an
operation th
Keep in mind that even if you get the scenario where EGit is installed first
working as you desire, you will still have to contend with the case where
EGit is installed after your plugins.
- Konstantin
-Original Message-
From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
[mailto:cross-p
That would akin to the developer stream in a typical streams release model.
It's the one stream that has the least amount of consumers and most these
consumers already know where to get the new builds.
The opposite of that is the long term support streams, which is rather what we
have with the
1 - 100 of 266 matches
Mail list logo
