Hi,
`modeling.emf.mwe` will contribute a 2.9.2 service release to Photon.
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.emf.mwe/releases/2.9.2
Regards,
Sven
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To change your
;
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Sven Efftinge
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks! We removed that usage already on HEAD. It is going to be released
>> on October 20.
>>
>
> Did you achieve that without using internals?
>
>
>>
>> 2017-10-06 15:56 GMT+02:00 M
t practically
> means treating internals as API thus encouraging people to use them
> directly instead of working close with projects they depend on to make
> APIs stronger and more feature full.
> I would +1 a case where the method is bringed back in Oxygen only for
> the sake
stead of working close with projects they depend on to make
> APIs stronger and more feature full.
> I would +1 a case where the method is bringed back in Oxygen only for
> the sake of preserving some compatibility.
>
> >
> > Dani
> >
> > - Forwarded by D
is important enough to do a respin. We could provide it by Wednesday.
Regards,
Sven
[1] - https://github.com/eclipse/xtext-eclipse/issues/393
[2] - https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=525462
--
Sven Efftinge
TypeFox GmbH
Am Germaniahafen 1
24143 Kiel
Sitz: Kiel, Registergericht
MWE will participate in Photon with offset +2.
There are no plans to have a new release however, so I reference the latest:
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.emf.mwe/releases/2.9.1
--
Sven Efftinge
TypeFox GmbH
Am Germaniahafen 1
24143 Kiel
Sitz: Kiel, Registergericht
Xtext participates in Photon with a +2 offset.
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.tmf.xtext/releases/2.15.0
--
Sven Efftinge
TypeFox GmbH
Am Germaniahafen 1
24143 Kiel
Sitz: Kiel, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Kiel, HRB 17385
Managing Directors: Sven Efftinge, Moritz Eysholdt, Dr
LSP4J participates in the Photon release with +2 offset:
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.lsp4j/releases/0.5.0
Cheers,
Sven
--
Sven Efftinge
TypeFox GmbH
Am Germaniahafen 1
24143 Kiel
Sitz: Kiel, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Kiel, HRB 17385
Managing Directors: Sven Efftinge
Hi David,
yes, I am a representative of Xpand. And Karsten (Thoms) already formally
announced the participation in another mail.
Also Xpand has an aggrecon file, so I think we are fine.
Thank you!
Sven
2016-12-16 15:28 GMT+01:00 David Williams :
> On 12/15/2016 08:56 AM, Sven Efftinge wr
l be +3.
>
>
>
> Michael
>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
> from this list, visit
> https://de
No, Karsten will very likely announce the participation of Xpand soon.
Sven
On 19 Aug 2014, at 17:27, Ed Willink wrote:
> Hi Sven
>
> Will this make Xpand obsolete as a separate install/download? (I hope it
> does.)
>
> Regards
>
> Ed Willink
>
Hi,
Xtext and MWE will be participating in the Mars simultaneous release, with
offset +2.
Current plan is to contribute the 2.8.0 release.
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.tmf.xtext/releases/2.8.0
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.emf.mwe/releases/2.8.0
Cheers,
Sven
Hi all,
I wanted to inform everyone that the Xtext project plans to contribute a minor
release (2.7) to SR1.
The plan is to release version 2.7 on September 2nd, which is +2 for RC2 [1].
We will contribute to RC1 as well of course.
Would it be possible to contribute a 2.7.1 to RC3 in case we en
ou really expecting more than that (really!) or could it be that you are
> not receiving them?
>
> Denis
>
>
> On 06/16/2014 11:57 AM, Sven Efftinge wrote:
>> I’m definitely missing lots of mails.
>>
>> Sven
>>
>> On 16 Jun 2014, at 17:16, Webmaste
I’m definitely missing lots of mails.
Sven
On 16 Jun 2014, at 17:16, Webmaster(Matt Ward) wrote:
> I restarted the bugzilla job queue a while ago and notices seem to be fine.
>
> -Matt.
>
> On 06/16/2014 08:33 AM, Jan Koehnlein wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> it seems like Bugzilla no longer sends emai
I agree, that this is unfortunate and should be fixed.
But doesn’t that only affect users, who have installed Java 8 plus the
Eclipse-support *and*
are using an environment for Java 8 but have the compiler set to something
below 8?
Is that something many people do? If so they will likely run int
I agree, that the descriptions should be informative rather than the completely
spelled out name of the project or so.
IMHO the main problem is the number of features provided. Eike gave us a good
example of that and it's similar for most projects.
The common CDO user usually just wants to instal
Yes, it is sort of a Java extension. For instance it extends Java with support
for template string concatenation ;-)
The advantage of Xtend over Freemarker and the like is that it is statically
typed and has very good tool support.
In addition it sports smart whitespace handling.
I've recorded
The offset for all three projects is +2.
On Sep 10, 2013, at 11:49 AM, Sven Efftinge wrote:
> Hi Wayne,
>
> Xtext [1], Xpand [2], and MWE [3] will be participating.
> For Xtext and MWE the next planned release is 2.5.0 (scheduled for December
> 2013 ATM).
> For Luna the cont
Hi Wayne,
Xtext [1], Xpand [2], and MWE [3] will be participating.
For Xtext and MWE the next planned release is 2.5.0 (scheduled for December
2013 ATM).
For Luna the contribution will be a 2.x release.
Regards,
Sven
[1] - https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.tmf.xtext/releases/2.5.0
Ed,
comments inline
On Jun 12, 2013, at 11:47 AM, Ed Willink wrote:
> Doesn't it need PMC approvals before being resolved as fixed?
No, we don't follow that policy anymore.
> From the yet to be superseded
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Modeling_Project_Ramp_Down_Policy/Helios
> After RC3: Two add
commit?
>
> Where's the build? dashboard shows no builds in the last 24 hours.
>
>Regards
>
> Ed Willink
>
> On 12/06/2013 10:00, Sven Efftinge wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I just wanted to inform you that we are building an RC4a today (now).
Hi all,
I just wanted to inform you that we are building an RC4a today (now).
It contains an important bug fix, which won't affect any downstream projects,
but is important for end users.
Regards,
Sven
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-pr
modeling.emf.mwe is not on the list, although it should. I don't see what's
missing.
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=409763
On Jun 5, 2013, at 11:21 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote:
> Greetings folks.
>
> I've built a little Bugzilla query that lists the projects that are missing
> some
Hi all,
as you might know, we've recently restructured Xtext and moved the language
Xtend to its own project under tools (tools.xtend).
I've just flipped the bits stating that Xtend is on the train and will update
all the meta data as soon as the infrastructure is available and the move is
comp
On Dec 16, 2011, at 3:42 PM, Ed Willink wrote:
> Hi John, Sven
>
> Thanks. It appears the double package provider is not a major concern, so
> I've done my job by raising the possible issue.
Great!
>
> OCL was easily fixed by changing the require bundle from com.google.collect
> to com.goog
Ed,
> No they are not interchangeable, which is how I came across the problem.
>
> They both do magic ClassLoader wizardry to support injection, and so when
> some plugins use variant A and dependent plugins use variant B the end result
> is a Guice class injection failure.
you were talking a
I think it's acceptable, since the are exported in different versions.
Also I don't see any alternatives.
Sven
On Dec 16, 2011, at 2:39 PM, Ed Willink wrote:
> Hi
>
> Does no-one have a view on whether provision of the com.google.common.collect
> package by two distinct Orbit bundles is accep
On Dec 7, 2011, at 2:53 PM, Denis Roy wrote:
>
> On 12/07/2011 08:43 AM, Sven Efftinge wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Dec 7, 2011, at 2:09 PM, Denis Roy wrote:
>>> So we moved /shared/jobs to a locally-mounted filesystem, which is not
>>> shared.
>>
>
On Dec 7, 2011, at 2:09 PM, Denis Roy wrote:
> So we moved /shared/jobs to a locally-mounted filesystem, which is not
> shared.
So if this is the problem. Why can't you make it shared again?
Sven
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-pro
Xtext and MWE are going to have a release today.
But the problems Dennis mentioned are holding us back.
Sven
On Dec 7, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Dennis Hübner wrote:
> Hudson links aka
> file:/opt/users/hudsonbuild/.hudson/jobs/MWE-nightly-HEAD/lastSuccessful/archive/mwe.p2.repository/
> doesn't work e
31 matches
Mail list logo
