Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Change in the default java on build.eclipse.org

2013-12-18 Thread Thanh Ha
On HIPP we do not even define a default Java so that projects will have to explicitly set it. I think for a build to be reproducible a project should never depend on the default Java and instead explicitly set the Java version they are targeting. The problem with defaults is when they suddenly

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Change in the default java on build.eclipse.org

2013-12-18 Thread Laurent Goubet
Ed : No, this was seen directly on build.eclipse.org, and our failing build (ecoretools) is not on an HIPP (as far as I know since I am not the main releng there). Dennis : M4 is the first time we see this failure, and we had never changed the default VM before. The default alternative (I'm

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Change in the default java on build.eclipse.org

2013-12-17 Thread Dennis Hübner
Hi all, I had the same problem with build.eclipse.org last week. After trying around with combination of different processors and ant versions I gave up and switched to the /usr/lib64/jvm/java-1_6_0-ibm-1.6.0 We really need a better JVM default, for HIPPs and build.eclipse.org. Best regards, Denni

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Change in the default java on build.eclipse.org

2013-12-17 Thread Ed Willink
Hi Laurent A long time ago GNU Java was the almost unuseable default for vanilla Unix systems. Have you perhaps just switched to a new unconfigured platform such as a HIPP where the defaults are different? Regards Ed Willink On 17.12.2013 10:33, Laurent Goubet wrote: > Hi, > > Wit

[cross-project-issues-dev] Change in the default java on build.eclipse.org

2013-12-17 Thread Laurent Goubet
Hi, With Luna M4, we've begun to see "strange" failures in our ant promoters : javax.xml.transform.TransformerConfigurationException: no xsl:version attribute on literal result node This happened for us on the ant promoters for EMF Compare and Acceleo, and we also had a random failure on