Luna, and opened *_Bug 437381_*
<https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=437381> to track that.
If DLTK project wants to participate in Luna SR1 or Mars, they will be
expected to be more active, timely, and communicative.
From: Simon Bernard
To: Cross project issues ,
Date
s, they will be
expected to be more active, timely, and communicative.
From: Simon Bernard
To: Cross project issues ,
Date: 06/13/2014 05:28 AM
Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] DLTK in Luna RC4
Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
LDT (Koneki) depends o
LDT (Koneki) depends on DLTK.
We never test it on DLTK 5.1. (We never found a repository to test it,
it seems available since June 11th or 12th)
There no problem for us to go with DLTK 5.0. It seems more reasonable.
Some threads to show we try to avoid that :
- https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc
Adding Koneki to the thread to make sure this gets noticed – I strongly suspect
LDT might be impacted too
Benjamin
Le 12 juin 2014 à 21:31, Wayne Beaton a écrit :
> Greetings folks.
>
> We noticed that DTLK updated their aggregation file only just this week to
> point at their 5.1 bits. Too
Greetings folks.
We noticed that DTLK updated their aggregation file only just this week
to point at their 5.1 bits. Too late, I'm afraid to make it into the RC4
build (which currently includes their 2013 "5.0" bits) and EPP packages.
Which Luna projects consume DLTK? (PDT and who else?)
Hav
