Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] EMF Repositories

2013-02-01 Thread Adolfo Sanchez-Barbudo Herrera
Hi Dennis, Kenn Thank you very much for the information, very helpful... Perhaps, I must have said "deprecated" rather than "obsolete" ;) One final direct question to clarify this point... There will be /2.10* (or whatever) repositories for Kepler+1 ? Well, in any case pointing to the new

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] EMF Repositories

2013-01-31 Thread Dennis Hübner
Hi Adolfo, thanks for pointing to the outdated /interim link. I changed it right now. This four composite repositories are pretty new and were created to keep build scripts simpler to maintain. So you can still the common name convention. So it's like Kenn said we will keep the /2.9* repository la

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] EMF Repositories

2013-01-31 Thread Kenn Hussey
Adolfo, All that changed, AFAICT, is /nightly was added. I don't think the /2.9* repositories are obsolete (they'd better not be!). The /interim repository should certainly compose /2.9-I-builds if it doesn't currently. Kenn On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Adolfo Sanchez-Barbudo Herrera < adol

[cross-project-issues-dev] EMF Repositories

2013-01-31 Thread Adolfo Sanchez-Barbudo Herrera
Hi Denis, Ed Xproject-ing since there could be other "relengs" interested. I've noticed that the EMF(core) p2 repositories layout has changed. Since I've not found any information WRT this issue, could you confirm that: a) /2.9* are obsolete. b) The repositories to find the proper artefacts f