Thank you for your reply. As I understand it you are saying that the naming in the repository is separate from the naming of the object once it is served back out for the purposes of another project. If so, then the Maven versioning information is completely separate from the OSGi bundle-version, and can be dealt with separately.
On 08/11/2011 11:07 AM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
The important thing to your question is how the various plugins for the maven projects finally place the dependencies into a means that satisfies the OSGi framework you are using.
Yes it was. Part of my concern was that P2 and/or Equinox seems to link the bundle's filename with the internal bundle-name and bundle-version, if Maven did the same with the "version" parameter the resulting bundle wouldn't work in Equinox/P2, and that led to the question of how other teams got around the issue (which seems not to be an issue). Thanks. -Eric _______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
