Thanks for the reminder, David. I've asked Janet about the date and
will announce what she decides when I hear back.
Wayne
On 01/29/2013 03:17 AM, David M Williams wrote:
And, Kepler is not that far away. I
don't recall seeing the "CQ
s-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org]
On Behalf Of David M Williams
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 9:17 AM
To: Cross project issues
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Heads up ... new
"Recommended" Orbit repo for Juno SR2
It
is too late for SR2,
Williams
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 9:17 AM
To: Cross project issues
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Heads up ... new "Recommended" Orbit
repo for Juno SR2
It is too late for SR2, for several reasons, but a great suggestion for Kepler,
if the TM project (or others) want it
hings for Kepler.
Thanks for bringing it up, though.
From: Stephan Leicht Vogt
To: "cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org"
,
Date: 01/29/2013 01:51 AM
Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Heads up ... new
"Recommended" Orbit repo for Juno SR2
Sent
U+ONw4kCQt/T6cQwZMJhZRdgAgAAH+ID//34PkA==
* Thread-topic: [cross-project-issues-dev] Heads up ... new "Recommended"
Orbit repo for Juno SR2
Hi David (and all),
We only want a build-time selection of Commons Net 2.2 from Orbit.
The MANIFEST.MF at runtime
roject-issues-dev] Heads up ... new "Recommended"
Orbit repo for Juno SR2
Hi David (and all),
We only want a build-time selection of Commons Net 2.2 from Orbit.
The MANIFEST.MF at runtime should be open to allow [2.2,4.0) or even higher (as
per the rec
: Cross project issues ,
Date: 01/24/2013 01:00 PM
Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Heads up ... new
"Recommended" Orbit repo for Juno SR2
Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
I would look into the filters that can be applied to a targe
"Oberhuber, Martin"
> To:Cross project issues ,
> Date: 01/24/2013 12:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Heads up ... new
> "Recommended"Orbitrepo for Juno SR2
> Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@ecli
oject issues ,
Date: 01/24/2013 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Heads up ... new
"Recommended" Orbit repo for Juno SR2
Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
Hi David (and all),
We only want a build-time selection of Commons Net 2.2
Power Systems
From: David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
To: Cross project issues ,
Date: 01/24/2013 12:13 PM
Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Heads up ... new
"Recommended" Orbit repo for Juno SR2
Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
To m
PM
To: Cross project issues
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Heads up ... new "Recommended" Orbit
repo for Juno SR2
To make the problem explicit, there's several versions in that repo:
org.apache.commons.net 1.4.0
org.apache.commons.net 2.1.0
org.apache.common
m_configuration
I'll look forward to learning myself!
From: David Dykstal/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS
To: Cross project issues ,
Date: 01/24/2013 12:45 PM
Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Heads up ... new
"Recommended" Orbit repo for Juno SR2
Sent by:cr
vid M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
To: Cross project issues (cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org)
,
Date: 01/24/2013 11:23 AM
Subject:[cross-project-issues-dev] Heads up ... new "Recommended"
Orbit repo for Juno SR2
Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
This morning I renamed our latest "M build" to an "R build" for use in
Juno SR2.
http://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/drops/R20130118183705/
I will leave M builds in place until Tuesday, 1/27, to give time for
anyone using them time to switch their builds scripts (or pom.xml files
14 matches
Mail list logo
