Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Making SimRel Great Again

Hi, ATL's dependency on ANTLR 3.0.0 is tracked in https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=553275 Kind regards, Dennis Wagelaar On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 1:25 PM Alexander Nyßen wrote: > Hi, > > I upgraded the GEF contribution to Orbit bundles from the respective > I-build:

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Making SimRel Great Again

Hi, I upgraded the GEF contribution to Orbit bundles from the respective I-build: https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/153406/ . Please let me know if that does not properly resolve the problems reported here. Regards, Alexander > Am 22.11.2019 um 17:21 schrieb

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Making SimRel Great Again

Hi, Sorry, for the late reply. +1 for more validation as part of the SimRel (Gerrit) build. I'm planning to set aside some time for this over the next weeks to add checks and fail builds for important issues like missing or bad licenses (and other checks that can be agreed upon to be essential).

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Making SimRel Great Again

Greg, Yes, the Planning Council has been discussing stronger enforcement.  One major problem is that removing one project can have a cascade effect on others, and this effect is not well understood; we don't have a Report on the dependency tree of the contributions.  But in the end, only leaf

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Making SimRel Great Again

Voluntary is good up to a point, and by all means give projects the chance to fix the issues before taking action. However if projects are not complying, then at some point you need to say that the quality of the release is more important. Now that the release cycle is more frequent, there

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Making SimRel Great Again

I don’t think that excluding these projects would be a wise choice. Then immediately a large set of project had to leave SimRel, and clients are used to find many of them in the SimRel. Of course the projects that are failing to fulfil the required constraints should know that they have to do

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Making SimRel Great Again

Hi Ed, Thanks for your effort to try to improve the quality of the simrel. I was wondering why we don’t simply exclude all non conforming projects from the simrel until these issues have been corrected? This would seem to be particularly important for projects contributing content that is

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Making SimRel Great Again

Matthias, Thanks so much for reading all the details! Sorry, yes the report would be better if it flagged "bad certificates".  It's only become clear recently why some certificates are bad, i.e., it's bad when the root certificate in the certificate's chain is expired and/or is generally no

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Making SimRel Great Again

Hi, thanks for spelling it out for us. The problem was not clear to me just looking at the reports (I still cannot see what is wrong looking at it now). I am following conversation on the lists, but not all discussions in detail. I will try to update the GEF dependencies for our M3

[cross-project-issues-dev] Making SimRel Great Again

SimRel Participants, While we're making progress on improving the state of the SimRel repo for 2019-12, without the active involvement of the ~80 teams contributing content, we're still going to fall far short of an acceptable quality benchmark. Many projects simply need to do a new build