[cross-project-issues-dev] Pleased with Hudson performance and stability

2012-09-14 Thread Denis Roy
I've been quite pleased with Hudson's performance and stability recently. It's not perfect, but it is much, much better than it was a few months ago. I think the software update and the good work Matt has done with the slaves has made a noticeable improvement. As I type this, 25 build jobs

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Pleased with Hudson performance and stability

2012-09-14 Thread Eike Stepper
Hi Denis, with all the continous effort you're investing I hate to say it, but the other minute one of my builds died with something like Problem spawning process: https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/emf-cdo-integration/2336/console Currently I can't look up the exact message anymore

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Pleased with Hudson performance and stability

2012-09-14 Thread Denis Roy
That's probably Jetty's fault :P On 09/14/2012 11:18 AM, Eike Stepper wrote: Hi Denis, with all the continous effort you're investing I hate to say it, but the other minute one of my builds died with something like Problem spawning process:

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Pleased with Hudson performance and stability

2012-09-14 Thread Jesse McConnell
Ha! someone is getting snarky now :) Of course I was just about to reply that it certainly wasn't jetty's fault :P -- jesse mcconnell jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Denis Roy denis@eclipse.org wrote: That's probably Jetty's fault :P On 09/14/2012 11:18

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Pleased with Hudson performance and stability

2012-09-14 Thread Denis Roy
We may have pushed her too far... :_) On 09/14/2012 12:11 PM, Eike Stepper wrote: Now I could access the console page: BUILD FAILED [...] Process leaked file descriptors. See http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Spawning+processes+from+build for more information That's