A service release never requires a review (nor does it require an IP Log
review). So, yes, just create a release record and you're good-to-go.
IMHO a release that only updates from the EPL-1.0 to EPL-2.0 is a service
release. I, naturally, defer to a project's PMC if they have a different
opinion.
Wayne,
Correct me if I'm wrong, but if the new bits being contributed are just
a service release then no review is required, only the release record,
correct?
On 09.02.2020 18:15, Wayne Beaton wrote:
Updating to the EPL-2.0 (and, by extension, the SUA 2.0) is not a
simultaneous release parti
Updating to the EPL-2.0 (and, by extension, the SUA 2.0) is not a
simultaneous release participation requirement, it's a general requirement.
I haven't been as noisy as I should have been on this forum. Instead, I've
been working with individual projects as they engage in the release
process. I'd
On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 11:12 AM Ed Merks wrote:
> Wayne,
>
> Are you suggesting that SUA 2.0 is a new participation requirement? It
> seems to me merely a very-nice-to-have. At this point I would just be
> happy if there were no corrupted variants of SUA 1.0 and SUA 1.1:
>
> https://bugs.ecli
Wayne,
Are you suggesting that SUA 2.0 is a new participation requirement? It
seems to me merely a very-nice-to-have. At this point I would just be
happy if there were no corrupted variants of SUA 1.0 and SUA 1.1:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=553881
https://bugs.eclipse
