Re: [crossfire] gcfclient options deathlist

2006-01-18 Thread Brendan Lally
On 1/18/06, Mark Wedel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Miguel Ghobangieno wrote: > > Yes, it would be best to remove that option from the > > menu IMHO. > > I just tried this out. If I select the 'Quit Character' option from the > file > list, it does ask if I want to quit or not. Regardless of t

Re: [crossfire] gcfclient options deathlist

2006-01-17 Thread Mark Wedel
Miguel Ghobangieno wrote: Yes, it would be best to remove that option from the menu IMHO. Could we also make quit ask the person if they really want to delete their character (and then ask again for confirmation)? (server side). I just tried this out. If I select the 'Quit Character' option f

Re: [crossfire] gcfclient options deathlist

2006-01-17 Thread Miguel Ghobangieno
Yes, it would be best to remove that option from the menu IMHO. Could we also make quit ask the person if they really want to delete their character (and then ask again for confirmation)? (server side). --- Brendan Lally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/17/06, Rick Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

Re: [crossfire] gcfclient options deathlist

2006-01-17 Thread Brendan Lally
Ok, to try and summarise from this. (this is how I'm reading the existing responses, yell if you think this isn't a fair summary). Not a target for removal: Split Information Window (Takes effect next run) Automatically re-applies a container when you use apply to close it. Still targeted for

Re: [crossfire] gcfclient options deathlist

2006-01-16 Thread Yann Chachkoff
Le Mardi 17 Janvier 2006 00:55, Brendan Lally a écrit : > I have been poking around gcfclient recently, and found a lot of > options that seem to be at best of limited use, and possibly never > used by anyone, so what I have done, is created a list of the options > in gcfclient's settings menus whi

Re: [crossfire] gcfclient options deathlist

2006-01-16 Thread Mark Wedel
Brendan Lally wrote: I have to admit that I've put most of those options in, but I've been using the gtkv2 client recently, so don't care as much ,but some notes: The list; Automatically re-applies a container when you use apply to close it. If off, when you use apply to close the contain

Re: [crossfire] gcfclient options deathlist

2006-01-16 Thread Miguel Ghobangieno
Yes, it would be best to remove that option from the menu IMHO. Could we also make quit ask the person if they really want to delete their character (and then ask again for confirmation)? (server side). --- Brendan Lally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/17/06, Rick Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

Re: [crossfire] gcfclient options deathlist

2006-01-16 Thread Alex Schultz
Miguel Ghobangieno wrote: Cached images are bad (for me). I always have this set off so I get updates from the server. So keep that Umm It seems you're unaware that the protocol is set up so the client always looks at a checksum of the image in case it's been updated. Alex Schultz _

Re: [crossfire] gcfclient options deathlist

2006-01-16 Thread ERACC
On Monday 16 January 2006 05:55 pm Brendan Lally wrote: [...] > Options on how to display resistances: - remove all options, set to > "Display all resistances in a single column, will use a single > scrollbar." [...] I use a double column with a scroll bar. I do not like the single column. Gene

Re: [crossfire] gcfclient options deathlist

2006-01-16 Thread Alex Schultz
Brendan Lally wrote: I have been poking around gcfclient recently, and found a lot of options that seem to be at best of limited use, and possibly never used by anyone, so what I have done, is created a list of the options in gcfclient's settings menus which I believe are unused, or always set t

Re: [crossfire] gcfclient options deathlist

2006-01-16 Thread Miguel Ghobangieno
Update about cached images, if we have checksumming (not sure if we do) that will update the cached image if said image is out of date, then cached images should be set to on as that will decrease bandwith usage. --- Brendan Lally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been poking around gcfclient r

Re: [crossfire] gcfclient options deathlist

2006-01-16 Thread Miguel Ghobangieno
Cached images are bad (for me). I always have this set off so I get updates from the server. So keep that. I also set the container thing too, the default setting doesn't work well and I set it to whatever the other setting is. SDL grid doesn't work IIRC (last time I tried). > Options on how to

Re: [crossfire] gcfclient options deathlist

2006-01-16 Thread Brendan Lally
On 1/17/06, Rick Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would it be OT or out of scope to ask for the "File -> Quit Character" > option in the menu to be renamed to "File -> Delete Character" ? Well, it wouldn't be if you instead suggested that the menu entry be removed altogether. I'm inclined to t

Re: [crossfire] gcfclient options deathlist

2006-01-16 Thread Rick Tanner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Would it be OT or out of scope to ask for the "File -> Quit Character" option in the menu to be renamed to "File -> Delete Character" ? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://en

[crossfire] gcfclient options deathlist

2006-01-16 Thread Brendan Lally
I have been poking around gcfclient recently, and found a lot of options that seem to be at best of limited use, and possibly never used by anyone, so what I have done, is created a list of the options in gcfclient's settings menus which I believe are unused, or always set to the same value. I am g