Re: [Crosswalk-dev] XInput 2.1 patches for Tizen

2014-03-27 Thread Hwang, Dongseong
Thank you for raising issue. The hack is not needed anymore. Following commits should not be cherry-picked in M35. commit 819dff732b00444e5a97696a98469d5442a972d3 Author: Hongbo Min hongbo@intel.com Date: Wed Aug 7 14:39:21 2013 +0800 Fix touch support issue on Tizen 2.1 On Tizen

Re: [Crosswalk-dev] Crosswalk Shared Browser Process

2014-03-27 Thread Pozdnyakov, Mikhail
Hi there, I also did a simple measurement with 3 apps, my results are: 1. Shared process model 1.3 MiB + 171.0 KiB = 1.5 MiB xwalk-launcher (3) 128.8 MiB + 22.6 MiB = 151.3 MiB xwalk (9) 2. Single process model (using --single-process --disable-extension-process, and with

Re: [Crosswalk-dev] Crosswalk Shared Browser Process

2014-03-27 Thread Pozdnyakov, Mikhail
Launching from id makes a memory usage difference indeed, as in this case we're accessing applications.db (and probably load a lot of sql-related stuff) however this should not give a huge impact: launching 3 apps (in single process mode) using ids instead of URLs increased the memory