Re: [Crosswalk-dev] [Intent to remove] Remove main document support

2014-05-12 Thread Long, Xiang
Hi Cici, For the main document /event system tests part, I think you can remove all of them in the list. And test for app.runtime.getMainDocument API can also be removed. Thanks, Xiang From: Crosswalk-dev [mailto:crosswalk-dev-boun...@lists.crosswalk-project.org] On Behalf Of Li, Cici X Sent:

Re: [Crosswalk-dev] Crosswalk Shared Browser Process

2014-03-28 Thread Long, Xiang
in the VM. Thanks, Xiang -Original Message- From: Pozdnyakov, Mikhail Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 7:45 PM To: Santos, Thiago; Long, Xiang; crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org Subject: RE: [Crosswalk-dev] Crosswalk Shared Browser Process Hi there, I also did a simple

Re: [Crosswalk-dev] Crosswalk Shared Browser Process

2014-03-26 Thread Long, Xiang
I did a test with all the 8 apps mentioned in your wiki, and here's my result: 1. ./xwalk --single-process --disable-extension-process app_id Private + Shared = RAM usedProgram 274.6 MiB + 91.1 MiB = 365.8 MiB xwalk (8) = 2. ./xwalk app_id

Re: [Crosswalk-dev] Intent to implement: [Tizen] Application API

2014-02-19 Thread Long, Xiang
Hi, Here I drew another diagram based on current design for better discussion. https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1F3MKXqb_3KFOrEGqv65UhYRhf_3knWo7-6g5XpyM0iU/edit?usp=sharing As I mentioned in my last mail, one constraint on current AMD is that: They get the client PID through socket attribute

Re: [Crosswalk-dev] Intent to implement: [Tizen] Application API

2014-01-10 Thread Long, Xiang
, 2014 4:54 PM To: Long, Xiang Cc: Oliveira, Caio; Barbieri, Gustavo; crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org Subject: Re: [Crosswalk-dev] Intent to implement: [Tizen] Application API It works fine now. We are an open project so why not allow anyone who has the link to add comments

Re: [Crosswalk-dev] Intent to implement: [Tizen] Application API

2014-01-09 Thread Long, Xiang
# Please help to review it. Thanks, Xiang -Original Message- From: Oliveira, Caio Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 5:05 AM To: Barbieri, Gustavo Cc: crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org; Long, Xiang Subject: Re: [Crosswalk-dev] Intent to implement: [Tizen] Application API Hello

Re: [Crosswalk-dev] Intent to implement: [Tizen] Application API

2014-01-09 Thread Long, Xiang
09, 2014 9:01 PM To: Long, Xiang Cc: Oliveira, Caio; Barbieri, Gustavo; crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org Subject: Re: [Crosswalk-dev] Intent to implement: [Tizen] Application API Again shared without allowing anyone to add comments. Kenneth On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Long

Re: [Crosswalk-dev] Intent to implement: [Tizen] Application API

2014-01-07 Thread Long, Xiang
samples and xwlak-launcher messages, I think I can provide them when we got the consensus on the above question :) -Original Message- From: Oliveira, Caio Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 5:31 AM To: Long, Xiang Cc: crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org Subject: Re: [Crosswalk-dev

[Crosswalk-dev] Intent to implement: [Tizen] Application API

2014-01-06 Thread Long, Xiang
-daemon --- app-extension-process Long term plan: AppContext support. For details please check the design doc: https://docs.google.com/a/intel.com/document/d/1n08dzcl3fawRW2Eccg95TC6DApe6RoAdUDqaZwNM8dI/edit# Regards, Long Xiang ___ Crosswalk-dev mailing list