On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Nikolaos Tsakalakis
wrote:
> No, I am just talking about debugging cryptodev
Then, to answer your initial question, I don't know if it would be
necessary, but it looks quite useful. As I'm unfamiliar with the
traces I cannot make any informed suggestions but
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Nikolaos Tsakalakis
wrote:
> Hello all,
> I am considering to develop several traces in kernel-cryptodev patch for
> debugging issues. Do you think that this is necessary? Are there any tips
> you think I should be based (e.g. buggy field, common errors)?
Hello N
Hello all,
I am considering to develop several traces in kernel-cryptodev patch for
debugging issues. Do you think that this is necessary? Are there any tips you
think I should be based (e.g. buggy field, common errors)?
Thank you in advance.
Kind Regards/Με ευχές
Nikolaos Tsakalakis_
