CRYPTONOMICON review

1999-06-04 Thread Robert Hettinga
--- begin forwarded text Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 13:33:44 -0700 Reply-To: Law & Policy of Computer Communications <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Law & Policy of Computer Communications <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Mike Godwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: CRYPTONOMICON review To: [EMAIL PRO

Re: NSA and Congress at odds over Echelon

1999-06-04 Thread Niall McKay
New York Times http://www10.nytimes.com/library/tech/99/05/cyber/articles/27network.html May 27, 1999 Lawmakers Raise Questions About International Spy Network By NIALL McKAY n international surveillance network established by the National Security Agency and British intelligence services has co

More on Congress vs. Echelon

1999-06-04 Thread Perry E. Metzger
Niall McKay (apparently the author) forwarded a pointer to this New York Times "CyberTimes" article on substantially the same subject -- it offers a lot more detail about the U.S. Congressional concerns about Echelon. (For those without accounts, I believe the standard "cypherpunks/cypherpunks" a

NSA and Congress at odds over Echelon

1999-06-04 Thread Perry E. Metzger
Federal Computer Week has an interesting article about the NSA resisting Congressional oversight about Echelon: http://www.fcw.com/pubs/fcw/1999/0531/web-nsa-6-3-99.html

Re: Salt (was: ICSA certifies weak crypto as secure)

1999-06-04 Thread Arnold G. Reinhold
At 9:18 AM +1000 6/2/99, Greg Rose wrote: >At 16:38 1/06/99 -0400, it was written: [by Arnold Reinhold] ... >> >>I would argue that UNIX is an excellent object lesson for John's point. 12 >>bits was a bad design decision, even in the 70's. > >I take exception to this last statement. The design (of