Markku-Juhani Saarinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I now believe you've decoded the below incorrectly because the leading
bit is set, making this a signed number which may have made some of your
tools croak. Decoding by hand, I get the following mod/exp:
Are you saying that under some conditions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Electronic Signatures Yield Unpleasant Surprises
Knowledgeable Internet users might think that the "Electronic Signatures
in Global and National Commerce Act" -- passed overwhelmingly by the US
Congress last week -- would provide virtual world commerce with
--- begin forwarded text
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2000 11:57:38 +0100
To: Digital Bearer Settlement List [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "R. A. Hettinga" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FYI: a pessimistic look at security
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
At 08:48 AM 6/20/00 +0100, Paul Crowley wrote:
...
If you don't mind the limitation of 1k of internal state, then
Panama could be used directly; push in your salt and passphrase,
padding to the edge of the block with one followed by zeroes, then
do 32 blank
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, William Allen Simpson wrote:
. . . .
Surprise! Many consumers comparison shop on-line, but quit before
purchasing, making their final purchase at a later time in a
conventional manner. Vendors are now permitted another new fee for
"withdrawal of consent".
